Discontinuities and Post-Bureaucratic Organizing: A Framework and Research Propositions

Some organization theorists argue that prevailing theories of organizing are based primarily on detailed observations of bureaucratic work, but that the nature of work today is sufficiently different to bring the applicability of these theories into question. They note in particular the growth in white collar and service workers, the rise of “contingent work” and the increased application of computer technologies. While various kinds of non-bureaucratic work such as project-based work and non-traditional employees such as contractors is not new, the pace and intensity of work enabled by communications technologies suggest that a postbureaucratic theory of work may be appropriate. Indeed, “virtual” has become shorthand for novel work arrangements involving telecommuters or virtual organizations. We propose that an increasingly important characteristic of non-bureaucratic work settings is the fact that the workers in these environments face discontinuities, that is, a lack of coherence in aspects of their work, such as the work setting, task, relations with other workers or managers. In this paper, we argue that studying how discontinuities have been managed in a variety of settings may offer insights into the nature of post-bureaucratic work. The first contribution of this paper is a framework that illuminates commonalties in diverse non-bureaucratic work settings and thus suggests how the existing research in these settings might be integrated. Based on this framework, we then consider how various existing theories might be integrated into a theory of post-bureaucratic organizing. We conclude by proposing a set of questions for future research based on this perspective.

[1]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[2]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[3]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[4]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[5]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Clay Sprawls,et al.  The virtual corporation , 1993 .

[7]  Kevin F. Kelly New rules for the new economy : 10 radical strategies for a connected world , 1998 .

[8]  C. J. Meadows Globalizing Software Development , 1996 .

[9]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[11]  J. L. Stimpert Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Theory, Methods and Research , 1999 .

[12]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  The Merchant of Prato - Revisited: Toward a Third Rationality of Information Systems , 1998, MIS Q..

[13]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[14]  Jay Bal,et al.  Virtual Teaming in the Agile Supply Chain , 1999 .

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[16]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[17]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[18]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[19]  Keri E. Pearlson,et al.  Two Cheers for the Virtual Office , 1998 .

[20]  J. Hagel,et al.  Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1999 .

[21]  Kevin Crowston The Virtual Factory: Discontinuous Work in a Virtual Organization , 2000 .

[22]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  The Dawn of the E-Lance Economy , 1998, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[24]  J. Guarino Book Review Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. By Denise M. Rousseau. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California , 1998 .

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[26]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[27]  M. Malone The Virtual Corporation , 1993 .

[28]  G. Hutton Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[29]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality , 1999 .

[30]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[31]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Change Agentry - The Next IS Frontier , 1996, MIS Q..

[32]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational Life , 2000 .

[33]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination and Virtualization: The Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  D. Robey,et al.  Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization , 1998 .

[35]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[36]  J. Burn,et al.  Communicating for advantage in the virtual organization , 1999 .

[37]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[38]  J. Gabarro The development of working relationships , 1990 .

[39]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.