The Incidental Development of L2 Proficiency in NS-NNS Email Interactions

Recent research suggests that email can be a powerful motivator for authentic L2 interaction, but little is known about the efficacy of this medium in the development of target language proficiency. The present study addresses this issue by examining email exchanges between university learners of Japanese as a foreign language and native Japanese university students. Of interest is the effect of email interactions on the incidental development L2 syntax and vocabulary as reflected in both quantitative and qualitative measures. Messages sampled at regular intervals over a 5-week collection period indicated a reliable increase in syntactic development as reflected in several measures of structural mastery as well as in qualitative ratings supplied by native speaking raters. There was no evidence of quantitative development for vocabulary, but qualitative ratings did show a small improvement over the collection period. A sharp drop-off was noted between the first and the second samples across all measures, with learner performance then improving steadily till the end of the study. The findings are related to an interactionist account of L2 development that is embedded in the framework of computer-mediated communication (CMC). Issues in research methodology are also discussed.

[1]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[2]  M. Swain.  The output hypothesis : Just speaking and writing aren't enough , 1993 .

[3]  K. Garrard.  A Mother's Language to Her Twins: One Child Down Syndrome and One Child With Normal Development , 1988 .

[4]  M. Halliday.  Spoken and Written Language , 1989 .

[5]  Terri Nelson,et al.  Murder on the Internet , 2013 .

[6]  Orlando R. Kelm.  The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language Instruction: A Preliminary Report , 1992 .

[7]  E. Tarone.  On the Variability of Interlanguage Systems , 1983 .

[8]  David Barnwell.  Some comments on T-unit research , 1988 .

[9]  David Chapman,et al.  A Comparison of Oral and E-Mail Discourse in Japanese as a Second Language , 1997 .

[10]  Elaine Lesley Wylie,et al.  International Second Language Proficiency Ratings: General Proficiency Version for English , 1999 .

[11]  Sheng-Chieh Amy Leh.  Electronic mail in foreign language learning , 1997 .

[12]  Alison Mackey,et al.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  Margaret Healey Beauvois,et al.  Personality Types and Megabytes: Student Attitudes toward Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) in the Language Classroom , 2013 .

[14]  Herschel Frey,et al.  Some effects of native-nonnative communication via computer e-mail interaction on the development of foreign language writing proficiency , 1995 .

[15]  Robert Gray,et al.  Using Computer Mediated Communication for Language and Culture Acquisition. , 1998 .

[16]  Nancy Sullivan,et al.  A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom , 1996 .

[17]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Virtual Connections: Online Activities and Projects for Networking Language Learners , 1997 .

[18]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  An ESL Index of Development , 1978 .

[19]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[20]  Mike Levy,et al.  CALL begins with a “C”: interaction in computer-mediated language learning , 2001, System.

[21]  A. Hughes.  Testing for language teachers , 1989 .

[22]  Pierre J. L. Arnaud.  The lexical richness of L2 written productions and the validity of vocabulary tests , 1984 .

[23]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Conversations in Slow Motion: Computer-Mediated Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom. , 1998 .

[24]  Karina Collentine,et al.  THE COMPATIBILITY OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS WITH BEGINNING LEVEL FOREIGN LANGUAGE CURRICULA , 1997 .

[25]  Mike Levy,et al.  Sustainability of E-mail Interactions Between Native Speakers and Nonnative Speakers , 2001 .

[26]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be Learned from Research on Instructed SLA , 1998 .

[27]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion in the Foreign Language Classroom: Conversation in Slow Motion , 1992 .

[28]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[29]  Richard G. Kern.  Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production , 1995 .

[30]  S. Krashen.  Comprehensible Output , 2005 .

[31]  G. Richard Tucker,et al.  ERROR ANALYSIS AND ENGLISH‐LANGUAGE STRATEGIES OF ARAB STUDENTS1 , 1974 .

[32]  S. Condon,et al.  Functional comparisons of face-to-face and computer-mediated decision making interactions , 1996 .

[33]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Discourse Functions and Syntactic Complexity in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication , 2000 .

[34]  J. Frommer,et al.  Foreign language learning using e-mail in a task-oriented perspective: Interuniversity experiments in communication and collaboration , 1993 .

[35]  S. E. Martin.  A Reference Grammar of Japanese , 1975 .

[36]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  A Second Look at T-Unit Analysis: Reconsidering the Sentence , 1992 .

[37]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  Incidental Vocabulary Learning by Advanced Foreign Language Students: The Influence of Marginal Glosses, Dictionary Use, and Reoccurrence of Unknown Words , 1996 .

[38]  Natalie Maynor,et al.  7. The Language of Electronic Mail: Written Speech? , 1994 .

[39]  M. Swain,et al.  Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning , 1995, Applied Linguistics.

[40]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, interaction, and the second language learner , 1994 .

[41]  M. Rafael Salaberry,et al.  L2 Morphosyntactic Development in Text-Based Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[42]  Seppo Tella,et al.  Talking Shop via E-Mail: A Thematic and Linguistic Analysis of Electronic Mail Communication. Research Report 99. , 1992 .

[43]  Paula Kalaja,et al.  Transaction and Interaction in Writing: The Case of Electronic Mail. , 1991 .

[44]  Nancy Deal.  Is the Medium the Message? Comparing Student Perceptions of Teacher Responses via Written and E-mail Forms. , 1995 .

[45]  Margaret Healy Beauvois,et al.  E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion , 1994, Comput. Humanit..

[46]  Towards a Fiction Policy , 1979 .

[47]  Una Lee,et al.  Using Internet Tools as an Enhancement of C2 Teaching and Learning. , 1997 .

[48]  R. Watkins,et al.  Measuring children's lexical diversity: differentiating typical and impaired language learners. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[49]  Christine Pearson Casanave,et al.  Language development in students' journals , 1994 .

[50]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[51]  Terri Cononelos,et al.  Using Computer Networks to Enhance Foreign Language/Culture Education , 1993 .

[52]  C. Snow,et al.  Mothers' speech in three social classes , 1976 .

[53]  T. Pica.  Classroom interaction, negotiation, and comprehension: Redefining relationships , 1991 .

[54]  Soh Bee-Lay,et al.  English by e-mail: creating a global classroom via the medium of computer technology , 1991 .