A practice–theory approach to homeowners' energy retrofits in four European areas

This article examines whether and how energy retrofitting of owner-occupied dwellings can be understood within the framework of social practice theories. Practice theories help to shift the focus towards more collective approaches and practices, rather than towards individuals. In addressing this question, energy retrofits are described and their variability compared in four European areas: Denmark, Latvia, the Coimbra area in Portugal and Wallonia in Belgium. Although these areas have different geographical, cultural and housing contexts, the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) provides a common form of regulation. As a policy, its main underlying intention is to promote the opportunities for energy retrofitting. Based on an analysis of 60 in-depth interviews with homeowners, it is found that energy retrofitting is not an integrative practice in 2010, despite the EPBD and other efforts to enforce such a practice. This lack of a retrofitting practice exists for a variety of reasons: it is not sustained by common and conventionalized routines, and by shared know-how and goals among relevant actors (e.g. homeowners and craftsmen). Based on practice theories, novel policy recommendations are provided to help to constitute an energy-related renovation practice in detached owner-occupied houses.

[1]  Usha Iyer-Raniga,et al.  Greening heritage housing: understanding homeowners’ renovation practices in Australia , 2014 .

[2]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption , 2011 .

[3]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Standby Consumption in Households Analyzed With a Practice Theory Approach , 2009 .

[4]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Refurbishing apartments and houses in Latvia and Bulgaria: levers and brakes , 2011 .

[5]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users , 2010 .

[6]  R. Horne,et al.  Green Renovations: Intersections of Daily Routines, Housing Aspirations and Narratives of Environmental Sustainability , 2012 .

[7]  T. Schatzki Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social , 1996 .

[8]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[9]  E. Shove,et al.  Consumers, Producers and Practices , 2005 .

[10]  Françoise Bartiaux Les performances énergétiques des habitations et les travaux de rénovation : une approche par les théories des pratiques sociales , 2015 .

[11]  RøPkeInge,et al.  Energy impacts of ICT - Insights from an everyday life perspective , 2012 .

[12]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Air-conditioning Australian households: The impact of dynamic peak pricing , 2010 .

[13]  A. Warde Consumption and Theories of Practice , 2005 .

[14]  E. Shove Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[15]  Patrick James,et al.  Evaluation of domestic Energy Performance Certificates in use , 2011 .

[16]  Gilles Bertrand,et al.  On the dynamics , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  Toke Haunstrup Christensen,et al.  Air-to-air heat pumps in real-life use: Are potential savings achieved or are they transformed into increased comfort? , 2012 .

[18]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[19]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Socio-technical factors influencing Residential Energy Consumption, SEREC , 2006 .

[20]  Françoise Bartiaux A qualitative study on home energy-related renovation in five European countries: homeowners’ practices and opinions , 2011 .

[21]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[22]  Andreas Reckwitz The Status of the “Material” in Theories of Culture: From “Social Structure” to “Artefacts” , 2002 .

[23]  Y. Strengers Beyond demand management: co-managing energy and water practices with Australian households , 2011 .

[24]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Existing buildings – Users, renovations and energy policy , 2014 .

[25]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Are there domino effects between consumers' ordinary and ‘green’ practices? An analysis of quantitative data from a sensitisation campaign on personal carbon footprint , 2012 .

[26]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  On “The Design of Everyday Life” , 2007 .

[27]  E. Shove Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[28]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Energy impacts of ICT - Insights from an everyday life perspective , 2012, Telematics Informatics.

[29]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[30]  Andrew Karvonen,et al.  Towards systemic domestic retrofit: a social practices approach , 2013 .

[31]  E. Shove,et al.  Product, Competence, Project and Practice , 2008 .

[32]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[33]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium , 2007 .

[34]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change , 2011 .

[35]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  Knowledge on Climate Change and Energy Saving Renovations by Apartment Owners in Bulgaria and Latvia. A Qualitative Study , 2011 .

[36]  Immanuel Stieß,et al.  Objectives, barriers and occasions for energy efficient refurbishment by private homeowners , 2013 .

[37]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[38]  E. Shove,et al.  Home Extensions in the United Kingdom: Space, Time, and Practice , 2007 .