The effect of the functional attributes of objects within the caged environment on interaction time in laboratory rats.

Abstract Determining rat preferences for, and behaviour towards, environmental enrichment objects allows us to provide evidence-based information about how the caged environment may be enriched. In recent years there have been many studies investigating the preferences of laboratory rodents for a wide variety of environmental enrichment objects and materials. While these have provided important information regarding the animals’ perception of the items, very few studies have attempted to systematically investigate the precise attributes that constitute a preferred object and the behaviour that these objects afford. We have designed a research program to systematically study rats’ motivation to interact with enrichment objects. Here we present the results from two experiments which examined the time rats spent with objects that only differed in size. This showed that rats spent longer with large objects rather than small ones, even though objects were presented individually. We also investigated the rats’ behaviour with the objects in an open field and found that rats spent longer climbing on top of the large object. This behaviour continued when the large objects were laid on their sides instead of placed upright in the arena, suggesting that the rats were not simply climbing on the objects to investigate the top of the arena and thus an escape route, but instead were genuinely motivated to climb. This suggests that rat welfare could be enhanced by the addition to their cages of objects that permit climbing.

[1]  D J Chmiel,et al.  Preference of laboratory rats for potentially enriching stimulus objects , 1996, Laboratory animals.

[2]  W. Greenough,et al.  Mandatory " enriched" housing of laboratory animals: the need for evidence-based evaluation. , 2005, ILAR journal.

[3]  L. V. Zutphen,et al.  Preferences for Nest Boxes as Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Mice , 1998, Animal Welfare.

[4]  W. Langhans,et al.  Enrichment-dependent differences in novelty exploration in rats can be explained by habituation , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  David Eilam,et al.  Open-field behavior withstands drastic changes in arena size , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  L. Havelec,et al.  CHOICE TESTS WITH GROUPS OF MICE : NESTBOX, NESTING MATERIAL AND TUBES AS ENRICHMENT ITEMS FOR LABORATORY MICE , 1998 .

[7]  P. Riddell,et al.  Comparison of preferences for object properties in the rat using paired- and free-choice paradigms , 2008 .

[8]  A. Poling,et al.  Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: Plastic pipes, wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels as enrichment items. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  E. Patterson-Kane.  Shelter enrichment for rats. , 2003, Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science.

[10]  A. Avery,et al.  Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. , 2005, ILAR journal.

[11]  A. Barnekow,et al.  Effects of different forms of environmental enrichment on behavioral, endocrinological, and immunological parameters in male mice , 2003, Hormones and Behavior.

[12]  P. Townsend.  Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats , 1997 .

[13]  E. Patterson-Kane,et al.  Foraging enrichment for laboratory rats , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[14]  E. Patterson-Kane.  Cage Size Preference in Rats in the Laboratory , 2002, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[15]  M. J. Renner,et al.  Object interactions in juvenile rats (Rattus norvegicus): Effects of different experiential histories. , 1986 .

[16]  M. J. Renner.  Experience-dependent changes in exploratory behavior in the adult rat (Rattus norvegicus): overall activity level and interactions with objects , 1987 .

[17]  L. V. Zutphen,et al.  Strength of preference for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice , 1998 .