The importance of land use/land cover data in fish and mussel conservation planning

Freshwater fish and mussel diversity is declining at an alarming rate across North America. Human land uses and disturbances within watersheds have been implicated as the primary cause of declines. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of land use/land cover (LULC) variables in species distribution modeling and conservation planning using a straightforward multiscale approach for prioritizing freshwater fish and mussel conservation areas in the upper Green River catchment (Ohio River basin, USA). We developed distribution and species richness models for 10 uncommon fishes and 14 rare mussels using multiscale landscape data and boosted regression tree (BRT) analyses based on LULC composition and pattern, geology composition, and soil composition data. We then used probability of occurrence, endemicity, prevalence, trend and range of individual species to estimate the conservation value of each stream reach. Conservation areas were defined for three spatial scales nested within the catchment management zone (focal areas, riparian management buffer and subcatchment management zone) using a simple optimization technique. Priority conservation areas were located primarily in the eastern (upper Green River) and southern (upper Barren River) portions of the catchment. We found that focal species richness is explained most by soil composition in the subcatchment. However, nested within the subcatchment scale focal species richness responded positively to percent forest and negatively to patch density of developed/exposed land in the reach buffer. For both the reach and riparian buffers, retaining forested tracts of land and limiting the level of development and fragmentation would benefit the focal species.

[1]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  The role of catchment scale environmental management in freshwater fish conservation , 2004 .

[2]  J. Downing,et al.  Relationship of declining mussel biodiversity to stream-reach and watershed characteristics in an agricultural landscape , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  D. Strayer Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[6]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Effects of Riparian Forest Removal on Fish Assemblages in Southern Appalachian Streams , 1999 .

[7]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling , 2002 .

[8]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[9]  James R. Aldrich,et al.  Rivers of Life: Critical Watersheds for Protecting Freshwater Diversity , 1998 .

[10]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  Selection of Priority Areas for Fish Conservation in Guadiana River Basin, Iberian Peninsula , 2004 .

[11]  Robert C. Bailey,et al.  Management options for river conservation planning: condition and conservation re‐visited , 2007 .

[12]  M. Araújo,et al.  Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability , 2004 .

[13]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[14]  B. Burr,et al.  Modeling freshwater fish distributions using multiscale landscape data: A case study of six narrow range endemics , 2009 .

[15]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? , 2005 .

[16]  John Lyons,et al.  Influences of Watershed Land Use on Habitat Quality and Biotic Integrity in Wisconsin Streams , 1997 .

[17]  J. Meeuwig,et al.  Freshwater Protected Areas: Strategies for Conservation , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[19]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  G. Helfman,et al.  MULTISCALE INFLUENCES ON PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL STREAM CONDITIONS ACROSS BLUE RIDGE LANDSCAPES 1 , 2002 .

[21]  N. Singkran,et al.  Influences of habitat and land cover on fish distributions along a tributary to Lake Ontario, New York , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  S. Naeem,et al.  Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem , 2003 .

[23]  F. Rahel Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. , 2000, Science.

[24]  Michael D. Burns,et al.  Building a Centralized Database for Kentucky Fishes: Progress and Future Applications , 2008 .

[25]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Extinction Rates of North American Freshwater Fauna , 1999 .

[26]  P. Moyle,et al.  Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity in California: A Five-tiered Approach , 1994 .

[27]  Wendell R. Haag,et al.  Decline of a diverse fish fauna: patterns of imperilment and protection in the Southeastern United States , 1997 .

[28]  Jane Elith,et al.  A method for spatial freshwater conservation prioritization , 2008 .

[29]  J. Allan,et al.  Reach‐ and catchment‐scale determinants of the distribution of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in south‐eastern Michigan, U.S.A. , 2004 .

[30]  Robert L. Hopkins,et al.  Use of landscape pattern metrics and multiscale data in aquatic species distribution models: a case study of a freshwater mussel , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  R. Abell,et al.  Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters , 2007 .

[32]  S. A. Ahlstedt,et al.  Status of aquatic mollusks in the southeastern United States: a downward spiral of diversity , 1997 .

[33]  J. David Allan,et al.  Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  R. Abell Conservation Biology for the Biodiversity Crisis: a Freshwater Follow‐up , 2002 .

[35]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[36]  J. Allan Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .