Image-Based Computational Models for TAVI Planning: From CT Images to Implant Deployment

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is becoming the standard choice of care for non-operable patients suffering from severe aortic valve stenosis. As there is no direct view or access to the affected anatomy, accurate preoperative planning is crucial for a successful outcome. The most important decision during planning is selecting the proper implant type and size. Due to the wide variety in device sizes and types and non-circular annulus shapes, there is often no obvious choice for the specific patient. Most clinicians base their final decision on their previous experience. As a first step towards a more predictive planning, we propose an integrated method to estimate the aortic apparatus from CT images and compute implant deployment. Aortic anatomy, which includes aortic root, leaflets and calcifications, is automatically extracted using robust modeling and machine learning algorithms. Then, the finite element method is employed to calculate the deployment of a TAVI implant inside the patient-specific aortic anatomy. The anatomical model was evaluated on 198 CT images, yielding an accuracy of 1.30 +/- 0.23 mm. In eleven subjects, pre- and post-TAVI CT images were available. Errors in predicted implant deployment were of 1.74 +/- 0.40 mm in average and 1.32 mm in the aortic valve annulus region, which is almost three times lower than the average gap of 3 mm between consecutive implant sizes. Our framework may thus constitute a surrogate tool for TAVI planning.

[1]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Toward patient-specific simulations of cardiac valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Patient-Specific Modeling and Quantification of the Aortic and Mitral Valves From 4-D Cardiac CT and TEE , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Wei Sun,et al.  Patient-specific modeling of biomechanical interaction in transcatheter aortic valve deployment. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  G. Latsios,et al.  Correlation of Device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  Scott Lim,et al.  Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S Tzamtzis,et al.  Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Rosario V. Freeman,et al.  Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies , 2005, Circulation.

[8]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2010, 13th International Conference, Beijing, China, September 20-24, 2010, Proceedings, Part III , 2010, MICCAI.

[9]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Complete valvular heart apparatus model from 4D cardiac CT , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Jochen Peters,et al.  Patient Specific Models for Planning and Guidance of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation , 2010, MICCAI.

[11]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Mitral valve modelling in ischemic patients: Finite element analysis from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, 2010 Computing in Cardiology.