STAND FOR TRIBOLOGICAL STUDIES OF HIP JOINT ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF CHANGING ACETABULUM ANTEVERSION ANGLE AND HEAD ANTI TORSION ANGLE

The article presents the construction of a hip joint movement simulator intended for friction and wear studies of hip joint endoprostheses. The simulator's design enables the fixing of hip endoprosthesis components in accordance with the anatomical structure of the human hip joint. The endoprosthesis head is mounted on a special base in the lower position with a neck-shaft angle of 135°, while the acetabular cup of the endoprosthesis is mounted in the upper part of the mounting head with an inclination angle of 45°. The production of three heads (responsible for the anteversion angle of the acetabulum) and three special bases (responsible for the anti torsion angle of the head) with different fixing angles of the components of the hip joint endoprosthesis made it possible to carry out tribological tests with nine variants of alignment settings. The hip joint endoprosthesis tester is designed to simulate the following movements: flexion and extension, as well as loads occurring in the human hip joint while walking. Thanks to the use of control in the form of electronic cams, the simulator makes it possible to recreate the variable value of the force loading the friction pair as a function of the human walking cycle. The subject of friction and wear studies were hip joint endoprostheses with a head diameter of 44 mm, made of high-carbon Co28Cr6Mo alloy. For each of the nine variants of endoprosthesis component alignment settings, average friction coefficient values were calculated based on the recorded values of the friction torque. The results of the friction and wear studies employing the simulator confirm that the mutual angle alignment setting of the head and the cup has an impact on the value of the frictional resistance occurring in the tribological pair.

[1]  V. Saikko Effect of wear, acetabular cup inclination angle, load and serum degradation on the friction of a large diameter metal‐on‐metal hip prosthesis , 2019, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  Ł. Łapaj,et al.  RESEARCH ON FRICTION WEAR OF HIP JOINT ENDOPROSTHESES OF POLYETHYLENE-METAL MATERIAL COMBINATION ON HIP JOINT SIMULATOR , 2018, Tribologia.

[3]  H. Haider,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of friction and wear in hip simulators , 2016, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[4]  V. Saikko Effect of increased load on the wear of a large diameter metal-on-metal modular hip prosthesis with a high inclination angle of the acetabular cup , 2016 .

[5]  V. Saikko Adverse condition testing with hip simulators , 2015 .

[6]  V. Saikko,et al.  The effect of acetabular cup position on wear of a large-diameter metal-on-metal prosthesis studied with a hip joint simulator , 2013 .

[7]  Henry Ho,et al.  A prospective, randomized study of cross-linked and non-cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty at 10-year follow-up. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  M. Edirisinghe,et al.  Cobalt-based orthopaedic alloys: Relationship between forming route, microstructure and tribological performance , 2012 .

[9]  F. Randelli,et al.  Cementless Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties at 13 years. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  John Fisher,et al.  High Cup Angle and Microseparation Increase the Wear of Hip Surface Replacements , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  John Fisher,et al.  INCREASED WEAR OF HIP SURFACE REPLACEMENTS WITH HIGH CUP ANGLE AND HEAD LATERALISATION IN VITRO , 2008 .

[12]  S Affatato,et al.  Larger Diameter Bearings Reduce Wear in Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Aiguo Wang,et al.  Hip simulator wear comparison of metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic and crosslinked UHMWPE bearings , 2005 .

[14]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Timothy M Wright,et al.  Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  A. Ciećkiewicz,et al.  Historia endoprotez stawu biodrowego do roku 1962 , 2014 .

[18]  Kevin Ong,et al.  The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  T. Wiśniewski,et al.  Badania nad opracowaniem nowego biomateriału przeznaczonego na elementy endoprotez stawu biodrowego , 2009 .