A Semi-Automatic Algorithm for Estimating Cobb Angle.

Background: Scoliosis is the most common type of spinal deformity. A universal and standard method for evaluating scoliosis is Cobb angle measurement, but several studies have shown that there is intra- and inter- observer variation in measuring cobb angle manually. Objective: Develop a computer- assisted system to decrease operator-dependent errors in Cobb angle measurement. Methods: The spinal cord in the given x-ray image of the spine is highlighted using contract-stretching technique. The overall structural curvature of the spine is determined by a semi-automatic algorithm aided by the operator. Once the morphologic curve of the spine is determined, in the last step the cobb-angle is estimated by calculating the angle between two normal lines to the spinal curve at the inflection points of the curve. Results: Evaluation results of the developed algorithms using 14 radiographs of patients ( 4 - 40 years old) with cobb angle ranges from 34 - 82 degrees, revealed that the developed algorithm accurately estimated cobb angle. Statistical analysis showed that average angle values estimated using the developed method and that provided by experts are statistically equal. The correlation coefficient between the angle values estimated using the developed algorithm and those provided by the expert is 0.81. Conclusion: Compared with previous algorithms, the developed system is easy to use, less operator-dependent, accurate, and reliable. The obtained results are promising and show that the developed computer-based system could be used to quantify scoliosis by measuring Cobb angle.

[1]  Luc Duong,et al.  Automatic Detection of Scoliotic Curves in Posteroanterior Radiographs , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Alan P Pinheiro,et al.  Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  C. Bach,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[4]  J. Birch,et al.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Edmond Lou,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  K. Shea,et al.  A Comparison of Manual Versus Computer‐Assisted Radiographic Measurement: Intraobserver Measurement Variability for Cobb Angles , 1998, Spine.

[7]  Yuanyuan Wang,et al.  Automatic Cobb Measurement of Scoliosis Based on Fuzzy Hough Transform with Vertebral Shape Prior , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Computerized measurement and analysis of scoliosis: a more accurate representation of the shape of the curve. , 1980, Radiology.

[9]  T. Cochrane,et al.  Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[10]  David W. Polly,et al.  Reliability Analysis for Manual Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Measurements , 2005, Spine.

[11]  E. Hall,et al.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J M Brady,et al.  Image filtering techniques for medical image post-processing: an overview. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  J. Hauptfleisch,et al.  A Comparison of Traditional Protractor Versus Oxford Cobbometer Radiographic Measurement: Intraobserver Measurement Variability for Cobb Angles , 2005, Spine.