Proteochemometric Modeling of the Susceptibility of Mutated Variants of the HIV-1 Virus to Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Background Reverse transcriptase is a major drug target in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) against HIV, which typically comprises two nucleoside/nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NRTIs) in combination with a non-nucleoside RT inhibitor or a protease inhibitor. Unfortunately, HIV is capable of escaping the therapy by mutating into drug-resistant variants. Computational models that correlate HIV drug susceptibilities to the virus genotype and to drug molecular properties might facilitate selection of improved combination treatment regimens. Methodology/Principal Findings We applied our earlier developed proteochemometric modeling technology to analyze HIV mutant susceptibility to the eight clinically approved NRTIs. The data set used covered 728 virus variants genotyped for 240 sequence residues of the DNA polymerase domain of the RT; 165 of these residues contained mutations; totally the data-set covered susceptibility data for 4,495 inhibitor-RT combinations. Inhibitors and RT sequences were represented numerically by 3D-structural and physicochemical property descriptors, respectively. The two sets of descriptors and their derived cross-terms were correlated to the susceptibility data by partial least-squares projections to latent structures. The model identified more than ten frequently occurring mutations, each conferring more than two-fold loss of susceptibility for one or several NRTIs. The most deleterious mutations were K65R, Q151M, M184V/I, and T215Y/F, each of them decreasing susceptibility to most of the NRTIs. The predictive ability of the model was estimated by cross-validation and by external predictions for new HIV variants; both procedures showed very high correlation between the predicted and actual susceptibility values (Q 2 = 0.89 and Q2ext = 0.86). The model is available at www.hivdrc.org as a free web service for the prediction of the susceptibility to any of the clinically used NRTIs for any HIV-1 mutant variant. Conclusions/Significance Our results give directions how to develop approaches for selection of genome-based optimum combination therapy for patients harboring mutated HIV variants.

[1]  Hugo Kubinyi,et al.  Chemogenomics in Drug Discovery: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective , 2004 .

[2]  T. Lundstedt,et al.  PLS modeling of chimeric MS04/MSH-peptide and MC1/MC3-receptor interactions reveals a novel method for the analysis of ligand-receptor interactions. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[3]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  Antivirogram or Phenosense: A Comparison of their Reproducibility and an Analysis of their Correlation , 2003, Antiviral therapy.

[4]  Bradley J. Betts,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and protease sequence database. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Erik Johansson,et al.  Multivariate design and modeling in QSAR , 1996 .

[6]  H. Marais,et al.  Epidemic up Date Aids Aids Epidemic Update Special Report on Hiv Prevention , 2005 .

[7]  R. Goody,et al.  Factors contributing to the inhibition of HIV reverse transcriptase by chain‐terminating nucleotides in vitro and in vivo , 1991, FEBS letters.

[8]  E. Clercq Strategies in the design of antiviral drugs , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[9]  S. Wold,et al.  Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O‐PLS) , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Predicting the response to combination antiretroviral therapy: retrospective validation of geno2pheno-THEO on a large clinical database. , 2009, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  J. J. Henning,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, January 28, 2000 , 1998, HIV clinical trials.

[12]  T. Lundstedt,et al.  Proteochemometrics modeling of the interaction of amine G-protein coupled receptors with a diverse set of ligands. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[13]  P. Campbell Functions of polyribosomes attached to membranes of animal cells , 1970, FEBS letters.

[14]  Thomas B. Kepler,et al.  Unselected Mutations in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Genome Are Mostly Nonsynonymous and Often Deleterious , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[15]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Selecting anti-HIV therapies based on a variety of genomic and clinical factors , 2008, ISMB.

[16]  D. Stammers,et al.  HIV reverse transcriptase structures: designing new inhibitors and understanding mechanisms of drug resistance. , 2005, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[17]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  QSAR and proteo-chemometric analysis of the interaction of a series of organic compounds with melanocortin receptor subtypes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  Proteochemometric Mapping of the Interaction of Organic Compounds with Melanocortin Receptor Subtypes , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.

[19]  S. Wold,et al.  New chemical descriptors relevant for the design of biologically active peptides. A multivariate characterization of 87 amino acids. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  N. Sluis-Cremer,et al.  Inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. , 2000, Advances in pharmacology.

[21]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  Proteochemometric modeling of HIV protease susceptibility , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  JD Lundgren,et al.  Prediction of phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs using physiochemical properties of the primary enzymatic structure combined with artificial neural networks , 2008, HIV medicine.

[23]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  Rough set‐based proteochemometrics modeling of G‐protein‐coupled receptor‐ligand interactions , 2006, Proteins.

[24]  Frederick E. Petry,et al.  Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[25]  R. Shafer,et al.  Genotypic predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  Improved approach for proteochemometrics modeling: application to organic compound - amine G protein-coupled receptor interactions , 2005, Bioinform..

[27]  T. Lundstedt,et al.  Development of proteo-chemometrics: a novel technology for the analysis of drug-receptor interactions. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[29]  N. Sluis-Cremer,et al.  Inhibitors of HIV- I reverse transcriptase , 2000 .

[30]  Paul Geladi,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 1987, Comprehensive Chemometrics.

[31]  L. Eriksson Multi- and megavariate data analysis , 2006 .

[32]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  XMPP for cloud computing in bioinformatics supporting discovery and invocation of asynchronous web services , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[33]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[34]  S. Goff,et al.  Retroviral reverse transcriptase: synthesis, structure, and function. , 1990, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[35]  P. Prusis,et al.  Proteochemometric modelling of antibody-antigen interactions using SPOT synthesised peptide arrays. , 2007, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[36]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Handbook of Molecular Descriptors , 2002 .

[37]  Takeaki Uno,et al.  Mining complex genotypic features for predicting HIV-1 drug resistance , 2007, Bioinform..

[38]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  A Look Inside HIV Resistance through Retroviral Protease Interaction Maps , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  J. Coffin,et al.  HIV population dynamics in vivo: implications for genetic variation, pathogenesis, and therapy , 1995, Science.

[40]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Data and text mining Computational methods for the design of effective therapies against drug resistant HIV strains , 2005 .

[41]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  Proteochemometrics: A Tool for Modeling the Molecular Interaction Space , 2005 .

[42]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Geno2pheno: estimating phenotypic drug resistance from HIV-1 genotypes , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  B. Clotet,et al.  Thymidine Analogue Mutation Profiles: Factors Associated with Acquiring Specific Profiles and their Impact on the Virological Response to Therapy , 2005, Antiviral therapy.