Connotation of hazard for signal words and their associated panels.

The present study examined the ability of signal words (e.g. DANGER) and their associated panels to convey hazard-level information, both individually and redundantly. Subjects constructed signs on a computer for 30 different scenarios. The use of signal words and panels was observed as a function of the level of hazard associated with the scenario. The results show that (a) the connoted level of hazard for signal words is not perceived as most standards suggest, (b) certain panel components (e.g. colour and symbols) are most critical in conveying hazard-level information, (c) no current set of standards or recommendations specifies panel formats which use these panel components optimally, and (d) the use of signal word panels was not necessarily based on the choice of signal word or on the level of hazard for the particular scenario. The results suggest the need for a re-evaluation of current signal word hierarchies.

[1]  M S Wogalter,et al.  Warning signal words: connoted strength and understandability by children, elders, and non-native English speakers. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[2]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Relative Order and Space Allocation of Message Components in Hazard Warning Signs , 1995 .

[3]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[4]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Strength and Understanding of Signal Words by Elementary and Middle School Students , 1991 .

[5]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Hazard Associations of Warning Header Components , 1995 .

[6]  A. Chapanis Hazards associated with three signal words and four colours on warning signs , 1994 .

[7]  S. David Leonard,et al.  How Does the Population Interpret Warning Signals? , 1986 .

[8]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Quantifying and predicting the effects of basic text display variables on the perceived urgency of warning labels: tradeoffs involving font size, border weight and colour , 1995 .

[9]  Michael W. Riley,et al.  An Investigation of Preferred Shapes for Warning Labels , 1982 .

[10]  Curt C. Braun,et al.  The influence of color on warning label perceptions , 1995 .

[11]  M S Wogalter,et al.  Influence of Warning Label Signal Words on Perceived Hazard Level , 1994, Human factors.

[13]  A. Loewenthal,et al.  The Effectiveness of Warning Labels , 1980 .

[14]  Sastry G. Pantula,et al.  A Simple Approach to Inference in Random Coefficient Models , 1989 .

[15]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Effects of Warning Signal Words on Consumer-Product Hazard Perceptions , 1992 .

[16]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Hazard Level Perceptions of Current and Proposed Warning Sign and Label Panels , 1995 .

[17]  Belinda L. Collins Evaluation of Mine-Safety Symbols , 1983 .

[18]  Michael W. Riley,et al.  An Investigation of Shapes for Warning Labels , 1981 .

[19]  R. S. Easterby,et al.  Safety labelling of consumer products: Shape and colour code stereotypes in the design of signs : TRC Repost No T79-8008; University of Aston, Applied Psychology Department, Birmingham, Report No AP-REP-75, Dec 1977, 49 pp, abstr in: R and D Abstracts , 1980 .