Why Twitter Displaces Broadcast Sports Media: A Model

The rising popularity of Twitter and the concurrent decline in audience size for local television sportscasts has fueled concern that the new medium is displacing traditional broadcasters. A model is offered that identifies the salient latent constructs that make Twitter a more attractive medium for connected fans in ways that transcend Twitter’s obvious advantage in timeliness. Issues relating to Twitter’s brevity, the public–private blending of athletes, parasocial interaction between users and who they follow, community building, homophily, and self-presentation are all addressed. The model offers propositions that can be tested by future research and provides guidance to broadcasters willing to adapt to what Twitter offers. Understanding why Twitter engages sports fans in a manner unlike that of previous technologies offers application for sports broadcasters trying to maintain audience share, as well as guidance for researchers seeking to explain the allure of the 140-character medium.

[1]  K. Lewin Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[2]  D. White The “Gate Keeper”: A Case Study in the Selection of News , 1950 .

[3]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[4]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[5]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Timeliness in the News: Television vs. Newspapers , 1978 .

[8]  Raymond S. H. Lee Credibility of Newspaper and TV News , 1978 .

[9]  B. Wellman,et al.  Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities , 1979 .

[10]  Sport and the Social Sciences , 1979 .

[11]  W. Gantz,et al.  An exploration of viewing motives and behaviors associated with television sports , 1981 .

[12]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[13]  B. Latané,et al.  The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities. , 1981 .

[14]  Timeliness Cues and Perceived Immediacy in Radio News , 1982 .

[15]  John A. Daly,et al.  The affinity-seeking function of communication , 1984 .

[16]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  D. Chavis,et al.  Sense of community: A definition and theory , 1986 .

[19]  R. Rubin,et al.  Development of parasocial interaction relationships , 1987 .

[20]  Garry J. Smith The Noble Sports Fan , 1988 .

[21]  Lawrence A. Wenner,et al.  Media, sports & society. , 1989 .

[22]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[23]  H. Miller The Presentation of Self in Electronic Life: Goffman on the Internet , 1995 .

[24]  L. Wenner,et al.  Fanship and the Television Sports Viewing Experience , 1995 .

[25]  B. Latané,et al.  Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. , 1996 .

[26]  Quentin Jones,et al.  Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  D. Nettle Using Social Impact Theory to simulate language change , 1999 .

[28]  Thomas E. Ruggiero Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[29]  Joseph M. Kayany,et al.  Displacement Effects of Online Media in the Socio-Technical Contexts of Households , 2000 .

[30]  서정헌,et al.  반도체 공정 overview , 2001 .

[31]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[32]  D. Wann,et al.  The Relationship between Team Identification and Willingness of Sport Fans to Consider Illegally Assisting Their Team , 2001 .

[33]  Josh Boyd,et al.  In Community We Trust: Online Security Communication at eBay , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Richard Giulianotti,et al.  Supporters, Followers, Fans, and Flaneurs , 2002 .

[35]  Raymond Boyle Mobile Communication and the Sports Industry: The Case of 3G , 2004 .

[36]  The changing role of local television sports. , 2004 .

[37]  Galen T. Trail,et al.  Relationships among Spectator Gender, Motives, Points of Attachment, and Sport Preference , 2005 .

[38]  Jay Newell Revisiting Schramm's Radiotown: Media Displacement and Saturation , 2007 .

[39]  Sports mania : essays on fandom and the media in the 21st century , 2008 .

[40]  LeAnn M. Brazeal The image repair strategies of Terrell Owens , 2008 .

[41]  Making room in the lineup: newspaper web sites face growing competition for sports fans' attention. , 2008 .

[42]  R. Vallerand,et al.  On passion and sports fans: A look at football , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[43]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  “You're the Kind of Guy That We All Want for a Drinking Buddy”: Expressions of Parasocial Interaction on Floydlandis.com , 2009 .

[44]  Richard J. Schaefer,et al.  Trends in Network News Editing Strategies From 1969 Through 2005 , 2009 .

[45]  B. Hutchins,et al.  From Broadcast Scarcity to Digital Plenitude , 2009 .

[46]  B. Palser,et al.  Hitting the tweet spot: news outlets should use Twitter to reach elusive and valuable audiences , 2009 .

[47]  A. Hermida TWITTERING THE NEWS , 2010 .

[48]  Jeffrey W. Kassing,et al.  Fan–Athlete Interaction and Twitter Tweeting Through the Giro: A Case Study , 2010 .

[49]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[50]  Ann Pegoraro Look who's talking - athletes on twitter: a case study. , 2010 .

[51]  Jason M. Simmons,et al.  Understanding Professional Athletes' Use of Twitter: A Content Analysis of Athlete Tweets , 2010 .

[52]  M. Sheffer,et al.  Paradigm Shift or Passing Fad? Twitter and Sports Journalism , 2010 .

[53]  Tom Leighton,et al.  The Internet & the future of news , 2010, Daedalus.

[54]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Classifying sentiment in microblogs: is brevity an advantage? , 2010, CIKM.

[55]  M. Sheffer,et al.  An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. , 2010 .

[56]  Galen Clavio,et al.  Uses and gratifications of a retired female athlete's twitter followers. , 2010 .

[57]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[58]  D. Mackinnon Integrating Mediators and Moderators in Research Design , 2011, Research on social work practice.

[59]  A. Virk,et al.  Twitter: The Strength of Weak Ties , 2011 .

[60]  D. Murthy Twitter: Microphone for the masses? , 2011 .

[61]  B. Wellman,et al.  Imagining Twitter as an Imagined Community , 2011 .

[62]  Jenny Rosenberg,et al.  Online Impression Management: Personality Traits and Concerns for Secondary Goals as Predictors of Self-Presentation Tactics on Facebook , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[63]  Edward M. Kian,et al.  Internet sport bloggers: Who are these people and where do they come from? , 2011 .

[64]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults , 2011, New Media Soc..

[65]  A. Hermida,et al.  SHARE, LIKE, RECOMMEND , 2012 .

[66]  K. Danylchuk,et al.  How Tweet It Is: A Gendered Analysis of Professional Tennis Players’ Self-Presentation on Twitter , 2012 .

[67]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Internet experience and time displacement of traditional news media use: An application of the theory of the niche , 2012, Telematics Informatics.

[68]  Arshad Zaheer,et al.  Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce Verification of Social Impact Theory Claims in Social Media Context , 2022 .

[69]  Marion E. Hambrick,et al.  Covering the Scandal in 140 Characters: A Case Study of Twitter’s Role in Coverage of the Penn State Saga , 2012 .

[70]  André Brock,et al.  From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation , 2012 .

[71]  A. Bruns,et al.  RESEARCHING NEWS DISCUSSION ON TWITTER , 2012 .

[72]  Patrick Walsh,et al.  Why We Follow: An Examination of Parasocial Interaction and Fan Motivations for Following Athlete Archetypes on Twitter , 2012 .

[73]  Jimmy Sanderson,et al.  The Positives and Negatives of Twitter: Exploring How Student-Athletes Use Twitter and Respond to Critical Tweets , 2012 .

[74]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Historicizing New Media: A Content Analysis of Twitter , 2013 .

[75]  Ana Cristina Vasconcelos,et al.  ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[76]  Lindsay Parks Pieper,et al.  It’s a Whole New Ball-Game: How Social Media Is Changing Sports , 2013 .

[77]  Toussaint Nothias,et al.  Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers , 2014 .