Perception about braces in parents of children with clubfoot.

OBJECTIVE To access the acceptability of Steenbeek brace by children undergoing clubfoot correction and their parents to ensure long-term compliance. METHODS The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Indus Hospital, Karachi from October 2013 to March 2014. A trained researcher interviewed the person primarily responsible for bracing the child using a pre-coded questionnaire. Modified Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey for satisfaction with either the Mitchell brace of the Steenbeek brace was used. It included 11 questions in the Parent Bracing Satisfaction Survey. SPSS 21 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Interviews were completed with 110 primary caregivers among whom 90(81.8%) were mothers. Overall, 32(29.1%) children were using the Mitchell brace, 30(27.3%) the Steenbeek brace, 46(41.8%) had shifted from Mitchell to Steenbeek brace, and 2(1.8%) had shifted from Steenbeek to Mitchell brace. Median duration of current brace usage was 4 and 3.5 months for Steenbeek and Mitchell braces respectively. The mean age of the child was 1.4 ±0.7 years, and the mean of 4-point Likerts cale score of parent bracing satisfaction was 28.7±2.2 in children on the Mitchell brace versus 28.5±1.9 for those on Steenbeek brace (p=0.505). Overall, 82(74.5%) parents had favourable attitude towards braces in general, but there were no significant differences in the items except "brace is easy to put on" (p=0.040) and "durability between Mitchell and Steenbeek groups" (p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS There were no differences in satisfaction levels between the two types of brace users.

[1]  E. Ebramzadeh,et al.  Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot: Experience With the Mitchell-Ponseti Brace , 2012, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[2]  J. Morcuende,et al.  Initial program evaluation of the Ponseti method in Nigeria. , 2012, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[3]  S. Wientroub,et al.  The influence of brace type on the success rate of the Ponseti treatment protocol for idiopathic clubfoot , 2011, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[4]  Mruthyunjaya,et al.  Need of a formal psychotherapist-delivered counseling as a part of management of bony deformities, with emphasis on clubfoot , 2010, Indian journal of psychiatry.

[5]  L. Zionts,et al.  Bracing Following Correction of Idiopathic Clubfoot Using the Ponseti Method , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[6]  F. Oprescu,et al.  Bracing in the treatment of children with clubfoot: past, present, and future. , 2010, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[7]  M. Dobbs,et al.  Update on Clubfoot: Etiology and Treatment , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J. Herzenberg,et al.  Sedation protocols for Ponseti clubfoot Achilles tenotomy , 2007, Journal of children's orthopaedics.

[9]  C. Walker,et al.  Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Jose A Morcuende,et al.  Congenital idiopathic clubfoot: prevention of late deformity and disability by conservative treatment with the Ponseti technique. , 2006, Pediatric annals.

[11]  J. Herzenberg,et al.  Ponseti Versus Traditional Methods of Casting for Idiopathic Clubfoot , 2002, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  I. Ponseti Clubfoot management. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.