Evaluation and modification of the Drought Severity Index (DSI) in East Asia.

Abstract The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived Drought Severity Index (DSI) can be produced at a 1-km spatial resolution and can be used for a wide range of water-resource and ecological applications. This study aims to understand the robustness and sensitivity of the DSI in East Asia, and we investigate the performance of the annual DSI using different Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) datasets. Additionally, the MODIS-based DSI is compared to other drought indices, including the DSI with Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) NDVI (DSI AVHRR ) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) with the Climate Research Unit (CRU) dataset. Three different drought indices are estimated in East Asia from 2000 to 2013 and compared via a correlation analysis based on a 5° × 5° grid. Specifically, the correlation between the DSI and DSI AVHRR is relatively high (0.796), which suggests the potential use of the DSI based on combined products that include parameters such as the NDVI, although the DSI originally used only MODIS-based products. Characteristics such as the frequency and spatial extent of droughts based on the DSI are compared to those based on the SPEI using the drought classification schemes that were originally proposed for the SPEI and DSI, including mild, moderate, severe and extremely dry classes. Based on the results, we suggest a revised classification according to a comparison of the DSI and SPEI. The frequency and spatial extent results of the SPEI and DSI exhibit good agreement when using this classification. Moreover, the DSI from the revised classification is used to evaluate drought events in East Asia in 2003, 2006, 2008 and 2009. Overall, this study shows the potential of using the DSI with datasets that differ from the originally suggested datasets; however, caution must be taken when classifying and identifying drought events.

[1]  C. W. Thornthwaite An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[2]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  First difference method: Maximizing station density for the calculation of long‐term global temperature change , 1998 .

[3]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Response to Comments on “Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009” , 2011, Science.

[4]  A. Nguy-Robertson,et al.  Effects of water-saving irrigation practices and drought resistant rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions from a no-till paddy in the central lowlands of China. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[6]  Jürgen Vogt,et al.  Comparison of drought indicators derived from multiple data sets over Africa , 2014 .

[7]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm , 2011 .

[8]  T. Phillips,et al.  How well do CMIP5 climate simulations replicate historical trends and patterns of meteorological droughts? , 2015 .

[9]  S. Vicente‐Serrano,et al.  A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index , 2009 .

[10]  S. Vicente‐Serrano,et al.  Comment on “Characteristics and trends in various forms of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) during 1900–2008” by Aiguo Dai , 2011 .

[11]  Jianping Yang,et al.  Temporal-Spatial Variation of Drought Indicated by SPI and SPEI in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China , 2015 .

[12]  John S. Kimball,et al.  Satellite assessment of land surface evapotranspiration for the pan‐Arctic domain , 2009 .

[13]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2007 .

[14]  D. Wilhite Drought and Water Crises : Science, Technology, and Management Issues , 2005 .

[15]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[16]  N. McDowell,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 1-2013 A Remotely Sensed Global Terrestrial Drought Severity Index , 2017 .

[17]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring , 2005 .

[18]  J. Hosking L‐Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics , 1990 .

[19]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluation of Earth Observation based global long term vegetation trends — Comparing GIMMS and MODIS global NDVI time series , 2012 .