Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing

Expertise in face processing takes many years to develop. To determine the contribution of different face-processing skills to this slow development, we altered a single face so as to create sets of faces designed to measure featural, configural, and contour processing. Within each set, faces differed only in the shape of the eyes and mouth (featural set), only in the spacing of the eyes and mouth (spacing set), or only in the shape of the external contour (contour set). We presented adults, and children aged 6, 8, and 10 years, with pairs of upright and inverted faces and instructed them to indicate whether the two faces were the same or different. Adults showed a larger inversion effect for the spacing set than for the featural and external contour sets, confirming that the spacing set taps configural processing. On the spacing set, all groups of children made more errors than adults. In contrast, on the external contour and featural sets, children at all ages were almost as accurate as adults, with no significant difference beginning at age 6 on the external contour set and beginning at age 10 on the featural set. Overall, the results indicate that adult expertise in configural processing is especially slow to develop.

[1]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[2]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[3]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. , 1975 .

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[5]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[7]  L. Farkas.  Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine , 1981 .

[8]  L. Whitaker.  Anthropometry of the Head and Face in Medicine. , 1983 .

[9]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[11]  I. W. R. Bushneil,et al.  Neonatal recognition of the mother's face , 1989 .

[12]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[13]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[15]  L. Farkas.  Anthropometry of the head and face , 1994 .

[16]  M. Baenninger.  The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing? , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  김정우.  특집 : 구약에 나타난 주의 영에 대한 교차방법론적 접근 ( A Cross - Sectional Approach ) , 1994 .

[18]  G. Hole.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[19]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[20]  R. Campbell,et al.  Recognition of Parts of Famous-Face Photographs by Children: An Experimental Note , 1995, Perception.

[21]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Development of Differential Use of Inner and Outer Face Features in Familiar Face Identification. , 1995 .

[22]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension , 1995 .

[23]  C. Umilta,et al.  Face preference at birth. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  A. Young,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception , 1998 .

[26]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[27]  Christine Deruelle,et al.  Do the right and left hemispheres attend to the same visuospatial information within a face in infancy , 1998 .

[28]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Newborn infants prefer attractive faces , 1998 .

[29]  M. Peters,et al.  Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire. , 1998, Laterality.

[30]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[31]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Maurer,et al.  Face Perception During Early Infancy , 1999 .

[33]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[34]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[35]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Newborn Infants' Preference for Attractive Faces: The Role of Internal and External Facial Features. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[36]  V. Bruce,et al.  Testing face processing skills in children , 2000 .

[37]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Development of face processing: the effect of face inversion. , 2000, Child development.

[38]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[39]  Experiential influences on the development of face perception , 2000 .

[40]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[42]  F. Simion,et al.  The origins of face perception: specific versus non‐specific mechanisms , 2001 .

[43]  G. Pike,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Effect of Inversion: Using a Picture Book to Investigate Face Recognition , 2001, Perception.

[44]  A. Freire,et al.  Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[45]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[46]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[47]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? , 2001 .