Automated blind control to maximize the benefits of daylight in buildings

Abstract Venetian blinds are a common type of shading device and are increasingly operated automatically to overcome the limitations of manual operation. Automated blinds need to be controlled to maximize benefits of daylight in the point of occupant comfort and energy consumption. However, the previous control methods are focused on minimizing negative impacts of daylight, so they might fail to maximize positive impacts of daylight. They may often overpredict a blind's position, resulting in the undesirable blockage of daylight. In this paper, we propose a new control method for automated venetian blinds to maximize occupant comfort. The proposed control method can not only protect occupants from direct solar glare but also maximize daylight penetration into buildings based on occupants' preferences on daylight. The proposed control method is designed to allow the occupants to define the zone they want protected from direct sunlight. It can control the blinds to protect only the defined zone; therefore, more daylight can be introduced to the other areas, excluding the predetermined zone. A control method for the case of one blind with one zone was developed and then extended for the case of multiple blinds with multiple zones.

[1]  Aleš Krainer,et al.  Fuzzy control system for thermal and visual comfort in building , 2008 .

[2]  L Roche Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system , 2002 .

[3]  Toke Rammer Nielsen,et al.  Simple tool to evaluate the impact of daylight on building energy consumption , 2008 .

[4]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Estimation of lighting energy savings from daylighting , 2009 .

[5]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  A simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting , 2005 .

[6]  L. Heschong Daylighting and Human Performance , 2002 .

[7]  M S. Rea,et al.  Window blind occlusion: a pilot study , 1984 .

[8]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  An analysis of climatic parameters and sky condition classification , 2001 .

[9]  T. Inoue,et al.  The development of an optimal control system for window shading devices based on investigations in office buildings , 1988 .

[10]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  A methodology for simulation of daylight room illuminance distribution and light dimming for a room with a controlled shading device , 2002 .

[11]  Kyung-Hee Lee,et al.  An Experimental Study for the Evaluation of the Environmental Performance by the Application of the Automated Venetian Blind , 2007 .

[12]  Tilmann E. Kuhn Solar control : A general evaluation method for facades with venetian blinds or other solar control systems , 2006 .

[13]  A. Athienitis,et al.  The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand , 2007 .

[14]  Jean-Louis Scartezzini,et al.  Daylight in Buildings - A source book on daylighting systems and components , 2000 .

[15]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  The design and evaluation of integrated envelope and lighting control strategies for commercial buildings , 1995 .

[16]  Athanassios Tzempelikos,et al.  The impact of venetian blind geometry and tilt angle on view, direct light transmission and interior illuminance , 2008 .

[17]  A. Wilkins,et al.  Lighting and discomfort in the classroom , 2009 .

[18]  R. Webb,et al.  A theoretical model for prediction of the heat load in flooded refrigerant evaporators , 1989 .

[19]  Robert Clear,et al.  Office Worker Response to an Automated Venetian Blind and Electric Lighting System: A Pilot Study , 1998 .

[20]  Staffan Hygge,et al.  POE Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings : A report of IEA SHC TASK 21/ECBCS ANNEX 29 , 2000 .