Inter-Worker Variability in Lower Body Postures During Assembly Line Work: Implications for Exposure Assessment

This study evaluated inter-worker variability in lower body posture and work activity during highly-structured assembly line work. Data were collected from 79 unique assembly line workstations in an engine manufacturing plant. Because the plant utilized work teams, 4–8 workers rotated through each workstation. At least 30 min of videotape was collected from at least three workers at each workstation. A computer-assisted work sampling procedure randomly selected 200 video “freeze-frames” for each worker. Lower body posture/movement (e.g., sit, stand, walk, etc.) was determined for each frame and used to estimate the percentage of time the worker spent in various postures and activities. Chi-square analyses were performed for each workstation to assess the significance of inter-worker differences. Due to variations in individual work methods, significant differences (p <.05) were found at 57 out of 79 workstations (72%). The greatest differences occurred when workers had the option to choose between standing and sitting (significant in 8 of 8 cases; in extreme examples, sit time ranged between 0–100% on one job, and 6.5–98% on another). Studying a single worker (or “proxy”) can contribute to substantial error when estimating exposures in workplace studies of ergonomic stressors, since the proxy may not be representative of all workers who perform the job. Individual measurements are preferable, particularly for jobs where workers have substantial latitude to develop individualized work methods.

[1]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  The Washington State SHARP Approach to Exposure Assessment , 2006 .

[2]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[3]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[4]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[5]  L Punnett,et al.  Ergonomic stressors and upper extremity disorders in vehicle manufacturing: cross sectional exposure-response trends. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  Bruce Levin,et al.  Assessing Significance in a Fourfold Table , 2004 .

[7]  A. Garg,et al.  The Strain Index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. , 1995, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[8]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[9]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Pascal Madeleine,et al.  Subjective, physiological and biomechanical responses to prolonged manual work performed standing on hard and soft surfaces , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  J P Bonde,et al.  Physical exposure assessment in monotonous repetitive work--the PRIM study. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  W M Keyserling,et al.  Median sensory distal amplitude and latency: comparisons between nonexposed managerial/professional employees and industrial workers. , 1993, American journal of industrial medicine.

[13]  W M Keyserling Postural analysis of the trunk and shoulders in simulated real time. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[14]  Jack P Callaghan,et al.  Prolonged standing as a precursor for the development of low back discomfort: an investigation of possible mechanisms. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[15]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work Design , 2008 .

[16]  Carel T. J. Hulshof,et al.  Back disorders in crane operators exposed to whole-body vibration , 1988, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[17]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  The occupational ergonomics handbook , 2006 .

[18]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[19]  E Buringh,et al.  Exposure variability in the workplace: its implications for the assessment of compliance. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[20]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Industrial Lumbar Motion Monitor , 2006 .

[21]  M I Jayson,et al.  Employment and Physical Work Activities as Predictors of Future Low Back Pain , 1997, Spine.

[22]  D. Spengler,et al.  Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective Study: II. Injury Factors , 1986, Spine.

[23]  V. H. Hildebrandt,et al.  Back pain in the working population: prevalence rates in Dutch trades and professions. , 1995, Ergonomics.