Rod-cone interaction in flicker detection

There is considerable evidence in the literature that rod-cone interaction occurs when both rods and cones simultaneously detect a test target. More recent evidence, however, has shown a parafoveal rod-cone interaction during dark adaptation for a purely cone-detected flickering test stimulus; this influence on cone threshold appears to be mediated by surrounding rods. In this study, we demonstrate a similar rod-mediated influence on parafoveal cone-detected flicker threshold. More surprisingly, foveal cone-detected thresholds are also influenced by rods. This effect occurs over at least a 2 log unit intensity range of mesopic background level; cone-detected 25 Hz flicker sensitivity is enhanced by increasing the radiance of the background. The action spectrum of this effect fits the scotopic spectral sensitivity curve. At higher background levels, this rod-cone interaction disappears and surrounding cone activity then influences the cone flicker threshold. The results suggest that, as rods recover sensitivity, they reduce cone-detected flicker sensitivity, even at the fovea. The rod influence on cone flicker is most apparent for long wavelength test stimuli. Our results, in agreement with recent reports, suggest that the rod-cone interaction is laterally-mediated and may be specific for the long wavelength-sensitive cone type.

[1]  R. Fatechand Attenuation of the frog's cone system during rapid dark-adaptation , 1979, Vision Research.

[2]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Spectral sensitivity by constant CFF: effect of chromatic adaptation. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Photochromatic interval during dark adaptation and as a function of background luminance. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  A. Adams,et al.  GANGLION CELL RECEPTIVE FIELD ORGANIZATION AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF LIGHT ADAPTATION* , 1971 .

[5]  D. Macleod,et al.  Rods Cancel Cones in Flicker , 1972, Nature.

[6]  D. Hood Suppression of the frog's cone system in the dark. , 1972, Vision research.

[7]  K. Naka,et al.  The cells horizontal cells talk to , 1982, Vision Research.

[8]  C R Ingling,et al.  Simple-opponent receptive fields are asymmetrical: G-cone centers predominate. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Lateral interactions in the control of visual sensitivity , 1982, Vision Research.

[10]  M. Hayhoe Lateral interactions in human cone dark adaptation. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  D. Copenhagen,et al.  Mixed rod-cone responses in horizontal cells of snapping turtle retina , 1979, Vision Research.

[12]  A. Eisner Comparison of flicker-photometric and flicker-threshold spectral sensitivities while the eye is adapted to colored backgrounds. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  N. Daw,et al.  Rod and cone input to single goldfish optic nerve fibers. , 1972, Vision research.

[14]  G. Fishman,et al.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry. , 1984, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  R. M. Boynton Human color vision , 1979 .

[16]  Rod-cone interaction in the dark-adapted fovea. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  R. Nygaard,et al.  Inhibitory influence of unstimulated rods in the human retina: evidence provided by examining cone flicker. , 1983, Science.

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  P. Witkovsky,et al.  Rod and cone inputs to bipolar and horizontal cells of theXenopus retina , 1983, Vision Research.

[20]  G Westheimer,et al.  The Maxwellian view. , 1966, Vision research.

[21]  L. O. Harvey Flicker Sensitivity and Apparent Brightness as a Function of Surround Luminance , 1970 .

[22]  P. King-Smith Visual detection analysed in terms of luminance and chromatic signals , 1975, Nature.

[23]  D. Macleod,et al.  Flicker photometric study of chromatic adaption: selective suppression of cone inputs by colored backgrounds. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  C. Stromeyer,et al.  The cone threshold: Spatial interactions of rod and cone adapting signals , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  T. W. Butler,et al.  Possible rod-cone interaction in dark adaptation. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[26]  G. Westheimer Spatial interaction in human cone vision , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  H. D. Baker,et al.  Effect of stimulus presentation rate upon visual threshold , 1977, Vision Research.

[28]  Jean-Pierre Raynauld,et al.  Goldfish Retina: Sign of the Rod Input in Opponent Color Ganglion Cells , 1972, Science.

[29]  P Gouras,et al.  Rod and cone interaction in dark‐adapted monkey ganglion cells , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  R. L. de Valois,et al.  Response of single cells in monkey lateral geniculate nucleus to monochromatic light. , 1958, Science.