Predicting the Peritoneal Absorption of Icodextrin in Rats and Humans Including the Effect of α-Amylase Activity in Dialysate

♦ Background: Contrary to ultrafiltration, the three-pore model predictions of icodextrin absorption from the peritoneal cavity have not yet been reported likely, in part, due to difficulties in estimating the degradation of glucose-polymer chains by α-amylase activity in dialysate. We incorporated this degradation process in a modified three-pore model of peritoneal transport to predict ultrafiltration and icodextrin absorption simultaneously in rats and humans. ♦ Methods: Separate three-pore models were constructed for humans and rats. The model for humans was adapted from PD Adequest 2.0 including a clearance term out of the peritoneal cavity to account for the absorption of large molecules to the peritoneal tissues, and considering patients who routinely used icodextrin by establishing steady-state plasma concentrations. The model for rats employed a standard three-pore model in which human kinetic parameters were scaled for a rat based on differences in body weight. Both models described the icodextrin molecular weight (MW) distribution as five distinct MW fractions. First order kinetics was applied using degradation rate constants obtained from previous in-vitro measurements using gel permeation chromatography. Ultrafiltration and absorption were predicted during a 4-hour exchange in rats, and 9 and 14-hour exchanges in humans with slow to fast transport characteristics with and without the effect of amylase activity. ♦ Results: In rats, the icodextrin MW profile shifted towards the low MW fractions due to complete disappearance of the MW fractions greater than 27.5 kDa. Including the effect of amylase activity (60 U/L) resulted in 21.1% increase in ultrafiltration (UF) (7.6 mL vs 6.0 mL) and 7.1% increase in icodextrin absorption (CHO) (62.5% with vs 58.1%). In humans, the shift in MW profile was less pronounced. The fast transport (H) patient absorbed more icodextrin than the slow transport (L) patient during both 14-hour (H: 47.9% vs L: 40.2%) and 9-hour (H: 37.4% vs L: 31.7%) exchanges. While the UF was higher during the longer exchange, it varied modestly among the patient types (14-hour range: 460 – 509 mL vs 9-hour range: 382 – 389 mL). When averaged over all patients, the increases in UF and CHO during the 14-hour exchange due to amylase activity (7 U/L) were 15% and 1.5%, respectively. ♦ Conclusion: The icodextrin absorption values predicted by the model agreed with those measured in rats and humans to accurately show the increased absorption in rats. Also, the model confirmed the previous suggestions by predicting an increase in UF specific to amylase activity in dialysate, likely due to the added osmolality by the small molecules generated as a result of the degradation process. As expected, this increase was more pronounced in rats than in humans because of higher dialysate concentrations of amylase in rats.

[1]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Peritoneal Residual Volume Induces Variability of Ultrafiltration with Icodextrin , 2014, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[2]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis: Urea Kinetic Modeling and Implications of Residual Kidney Function , 2012, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[3]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Three-Pore Model Predictions of 24-Hour Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Therapy Using Bimodal Solutions , 2011, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[4]  N. Chen,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of icodextrin versus glucose containing peritoneal dialysis fluid. , 2009, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[5]  B. Lindholm,et al.  Icodextrin Metabolites in Peritoneal Dialysis , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[6]  T. Stompór,et al.  Understanding the variability in Ultrafiltration Obtained with Icodextrin , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[7]  D. Oreopoulos,et al.  The Variability in Ultrafiltration Achieved with Icodextrin, Possibly Explained , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[8]  B. Rippe How to Assess Transport in Animals? , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[9]  J. Waniewski,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of Peritoneal Fluid and Solute Transport with Combination of Glucose and Icodextrin as Osmotic Agents , 2009, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[10]  Shinsuke Nomura,et al.  Molecular weight of polydisperse icodextrin effects its oncotic contribution to water transport , 2008, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[11]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Ultrafiltration efficiency during automated peritoneal dialysis using glucose-based solutions. , 2008, Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis.

[12]  K. Pawlaczyk,et al.  Icodextrin Metabolism and Alpha-Amylase Activity in Nonuremic Rats Undergoing Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis , 2007, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[13]  B. Rippe,et al.  Disproportionally low clearance of macromolecules from the plasma to the peritoneal cavity in a mouse model of peritoneal dialysis. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[14]  S. Mujais,et al.  Glucose sparing in peritoneal dialysis: implications and metrics. , 2006, Kidney international. Supplement.

[15]  E. Vonesh,et al.  Modeling of Icodextrin in PD Adequest® 2.0 , 2006, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[16]  I. Karayaylali,et al.  What is the Optimal Dwell Time for Maximizing Ultrafiltration with Icodextrin Exchange in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients? , 2006, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[17]  A. Werynski,et al.  Determination of High and Low Molecular Weight Molecules of Icodextrin in Plasma and Dialysate, Using Gel Filtration Chromatography, in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients , 2005, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[18]  S. Mujais,et al.  Superiority of icodextrin compared with 4.25% dextrose for peritoneal ultrafiltration. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[19]  H. Moore,et al.  Peritoneal Equilibration Test , 1987 .

[20]  N. Yorioka,et al.  Peritoneal Ultrafiltration and Serum Icodextrin Concentration during Dialysis with 7.5% Icodextrin Solution in Japanese Patients , 2003, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[21]  S. Mujais,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis patients. , 2002, Kidney international. Supplement.

[22]  U. Bahner,et al.  Efficacy and safety of a 7.5% icodextrin peritoneal dialysis solution in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[23]  D. Struijk,et al.  Icodextrin Degradation Products in Spent Dialysate of CAPD Patients and the Rat, and its Relation with Dialysate Osmolality , 2001, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[24]  B. Rippe,et al.  Computer simulations of ultrafiltration profiles for an icodextrin-based peritoneal fluid in CAPD. , 2000, Kidney international.

[25]  D. Struijk,et al.  Icodextrin with nitroprusside increases ultrafiltration and peritoneal transport during long CAPD dwells. , 1998, Kidney international.

[26]  Tao Wang,et al.  Peritoneal Fluid and Solute Transport with Different Polyglucose Formulations , 1998, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[27]  N. Schouten,et al.  Peritoneal transport characteristics with glucose polymer based dialysate. , 1996, Kidney international.

[28]  J. Waniewski,et al.  A quantitative description of solute and fluid transport during peritoneal dialysis. , 1992, Kidney international.

[29]  B. Haraldsson,et al.  Computer simulations of peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD. , 1991, Kidney international.

[30]  B. Rippe,et al.  A phenomenological interpretation of the variation in dialysate volume with dwell time in CAPD. , 1990, Kidney international.

[31]  D. Van Dyk,et al.  [Peritoneal equilibration test]. , 1990, Harefuah.