The Need to Reconcile Concepts that Characterize Systems Facing Threats

Desirable system performance in the face of threats has been characterized by various management concepts. Through semistructured interviews with editors of journals in the fields of emergency response and systems management, a literature review, and professional judgment, we identified nine related and often interchangeably used system performance concepts: adaptability, agility, reliability, resilience, resistance, robustness, safety, security, and sustainability. A better understanding of these concepts will allow system planners to pursue management strategies best suited to their unique system dynamics and specific objectives of good performance. We analyze expert responses and review the linguistic definitions and mathematical framing of these concepts to understand their applications. We find a lack of consensus on their usage between interview subjects, but by using the mathematical framing to enrich the linguistic definitions, we formulate comparative visualizations and propose distinct definitions for the nine concepts. We present a conceptual framing to relate the concepts for management purposes.

[1]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  Dealing with supply chain risks , 2012 .

[2]  Hiba Baroud,et al.  Selecting Indicators for Assessing Community Sustainable Resilience , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Hiba Baroud,et al.  Quantifying Community Resilience Using Hierarchical Bayesian Kernel Methods: A Case Study on Recovery from Power Outages. , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Ilan Noy,et al.  Disaster Risk Management Policies and the Measurement of Resilience for Philippine Regions , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A resilience matrix approach for measuring and mitigating disaster-induced population displacement , 2020 .

[6]  Eugene Ch'ng,et al.  Modelling the Adaptability of Biological Systems , 2007 .

[7]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Operational resilience: concepts, design and analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  The combined use of resilience and loop diameter uniformity as a good indirect measure of network reliability , 2016 .

[9]  Randy K. Buchanan,et al.  Assessing Engineering Resilience for Systems with Multiple Performance Measures , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Resilience and sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  S. Southwick,et al.  Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives , 2014, European journal of psychotraumatology.

[12]  Kash Barker,et al.  A review of definitions and measures of system resilience , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Don P Clausing Operating Window: An Engineering Measure for Robustness , 2004, Technometrics.

[14]  Alexander J. Stewart,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ROBUSTNESS AND THE ADAPTABILITY OF POPULATIONS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  Max Boholm,et al.  Risk and Quantification: A Linguistic Study , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  J. Sheppard,et al.  Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  Mike S. Fowler,et al.  Navigating the complexity of ecological stability. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[18]  Theodore D. Cosco,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of successful ageing and resilience: critique, integration and implications / Aspectos psicológicos del envejecimiento exitoso y la resiliencia: crítica, integración e implicaciones , 2018, Estudios de Psicología.

[19]  Torgeir Welo,et al.  Conceptualizing resilience in engineering systems: An analysis of the literature , 2019, Syst. Eng..