Regional assessment on influence of landscape configuration and connectivity on range size of white-tailed deer

Variation in the size of home range of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) has broad implications for managing populations, agricultural damage, and disease spread and transmission. Size of home range of deer also varies seasonally because plant phenology dictates the vegetation types that are used as foraging or resting sites. Knowledge of the landscape configuration and connectivity that contributes to variation in size of home range of deer for the region is needed to fully understand differences and similarities of deer ecology throughout the Midwest. We developed a research team from four Midwestern states to investigate how size of home range of deer in agro-forested landscapes is influenced by variations in landscape characteristics that provide essential habitat components. We found that for resident female deer, annual size of home range in Illinois (mean = 0.99 km2), Michigan (mean = 1.34 km2), Nebraska (mean = 1.20 km2), and Wisconsin (mean = 1.47 km2) did not differ across the region (F3,175 = 0.42, P = 0.737), but differences between agricultural growing and nongrowing periods were apparent. Variables influencing size of home range included: distance to forests, roads, and urban development from the centroid of deer home range, and percent of crop as well as four landscape pattern indices (contrast-weighted edge density, mean nearest neighbor, area-weighted mean shape index, and patch size coefficient of variation). We also identified differences in model selection for four landscapes created hierarchically to reflect levels of landscape connectivity determined from perceived ability of deer to traverse the landscape. Connectivity of selected forested regions within agro-forested ecosystems across the Midwest plays a greater role in understanding the size of home ranges than traditional definitions of deer habitat conditions and landscape configuration.

[1]  N. Connelly,et al.  PUBLIC TOLERANCE OF DEER IN A SUBURBAN ENVIRONMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL , 1987 .

[2]  G. Whitney,et al.  A case study of woodland continuity and change in the American Midwest , 1985 .

[3]  R. G. Ford Home Range in a Patchy Environment: Optimal Foraging Predictions , 1983 .

[4]  D. E. Andersen,et al.  Determinign home-range size of resident coyotes from point and sequential locations , 1990 .

[5]  Gary D. Schnell,et al.  Effects of agriculture on habitat complexity in a prairie-forest ecotone in the Southern Great Plains of North America , 2001 .

[6]  S. DeStefano,et al.  Collaboration for community-based wildlife management , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[7]  R. Warren,et al.  Responses of urban deer to a 50% reduction in local herd density. , 2000 .

[8]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Ecological sources of zoonotic diseases. , 2004, Revue scientifique et technique.

[9]  H. Kilpatrick,et al.  Effects of population reduction on home ranges of female white-tailed deer at high densities , 2001 .

[10]  H. Kilpatrick,et al.  Spatial and temporal use of a suburban landscape by female white-tailed deer. , 2000 .

[11]  A. Woolf,et al.  Space Use and Survival of White-Tailed Deer in an Exurban Landscape , 2007 .

[12]  H. Campa,et al.  Applying Landscape-Scale Habitat-Potential Models to Understand Deer Spatial Structure and Movement Patterns , 2007 .

[13]  C. DePerno,et al.  MOVEMENT OF FEMALE WHITE-TAILED DEER: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE AND INTENSIVE ROW-CROP AGRICULTURE , 2005 .

[14]  M. D. Samuel,et al.  White-Tailed Deer Harvest From the Chronic Wasting Disease Eradication Zone in South-Central Wisconsin , 2006 .

[15]  L. Kjær,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Contact Rates in Female White-Tailed Deer , 2008 .

[16]  K. Vercauteren,et al.  Effects of agricultural activities and hunting on home ranges of female white-tailed deer , 1998 .

[17]  M. Miller,et al.  MOVEMENT PATTERNS AND SPATIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF A PRION DISEASE IN MULE DEER POPULATION UNITS , 2004 .

[18]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Scale-dependent proximity of wildlife habitat in a spatially-neutral Bayesian model , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  S. Fitzgerald,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDING OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) ON THE PREVALENCE OF BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS IN THE MICHIGAN WILD DEER POPULATION , 2003, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[20]  K. Dugger,et al.  Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management , 2007 .

[21]  Evan H. Girvetz,et al.  How to define a patch: a spatial model for hierarchically delineating organism-specific habitat patches , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  G. Hickling,et al.  Managing the wildlife reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis: the Michigan, USA, experience. , 2006, Veterinary microbiology.

[23]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[24]  G. Montgomery NOCTURNAL MOVEMENTS AND ACTIVITY RHYTHMS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER' , 1963 .

[25]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[26]  J. Wiens Population Responses to Patchy Environments , 1976 .

[27]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[28]  Daniel J. Decker,et al.  PERCEPTIONS OF RISK FROM DEER-RELATED VEHICLE ACCIDENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR DEER HERD SIZE , 1993 .

[29]  Paul Beier,et al.  Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use. , 1990 .

[30]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[31]  D. Diefenbach,et al.  FOREST COVER INFLUENCES DISPERSAL DISTANCE OF WHITE-TAILED DEER , 2005 .

[32]  Peter Jewell,et al.  Problems in Management of Locally Abundant Wild Mammals , 1982 .

[33]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[34]  Alan D. Woolf,et al.  Site and landscape conditions at white-tailed deer/vehicle collision locations in Illinois , 1999 .

[35]  E. Wiggers,et al.  Seasonal Movements and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer Associated with an Urban Park , 2002 .

[36]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  S. Saïd,et al.  The Influence of Landscape Structure on Female Roe Deer Home-range Size , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  D. Decker,et al.  Public Attitudes toward a Suburban Deer Herd , 1987 .

[39]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[40]  N. Owen‐Smith Functional heterogeneity in resources within landscapes and herbivore population dynamics , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  D. Ludwig,et al.  Survival and movements of white-tailed deer in suburban Chicago, Illinois , 2002 .

[42]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Land‐Use Dynamics Beyond the American Urban Fringe* , 2001 .

[43]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Resource Selection and Spatial Separation of Mule Deer and Elk during Spring , 2000 .

[44]  L. K. Halls,et al.  White-tailed deer : ecology and management , 1985 .

[45]  A. Spielman,et al.  Reduced abundance of immature Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) following incremental removal of deer. , 1993, Journal of medical entomology.

[46]  T. Cooley,et al.  BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS IN FREE-RANGING WHITE-TAILED DEER FROM MICHIGAN , 1997, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[47]  N. Thompson Hobbs,et al.  Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat , 1997 .

[48]  W. D. Walter,et al.  Crop, Native Vegetation, and Biofuels: Response of White-Tailed Deer to Changing Management Priorities , 2009 .

[49]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  Michael W. Hubbard,et al.  Factors influencing the location of deer-vehicle accidents in Iowa. , 2000 .

[51]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[52]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[53]  N. Mathews,et al.  White-Tailed Deer Movements in a Chronic Wasting Disease Area in South-Central Wisconsin , 2008 .

[54]  John G. Kie,et al.  LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY AT DIFFERING SCALES: EFFECTS ON SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MULE DEER , 2002 .

[55]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Measurement of territory and home range size in birds , 1955 .