The Short Term Memory Structure In State-Of-The Art Recall/Recognition Experiments of Rubin, Hinton and Wentzel

Properties of a short term memory structure are discovered in the data of Rubin, Hinton and Wenzel (1999): Recall (recognition) probabilities and search times are linearly related through stimulus presentation lags from 6 seconds to 600 (350) seconds. This data suggest that only one memory structure is present in the Rubin, Hinton and Wenzel data. The data also suggest that the memory items have a finite effective size that shrinks to zero in a logarithmic fashion as the time since stimulus presentation increases, away from the start of the search. According to the logarithmic decay, the size of the memory items decreases to a couple of neurons at about 1200 seconds for recall and 350 seconds for recognition – this should be the time scale for a short term memory being converted to a long term memory. The incorrect recall time saturates, suggesting a limited size of the short term memory structure: the time to search through the structure for recall is 1.7 seconds. For recognition the corresponding time is about 0.4 seconds, a non-Sternberg experimental result to compare with the 0.243 seconds given by Cavanagh (1972)).

[1]  J. P. Cavanagh Relation between the immediate memory span and the memory search rate. , 1972 .

[2]  O Jensen,et al.  An Oscillatory Short-Term Memory Buffer Model Can Account for Data on the Sternberg Task , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  The Precise Time Course of Retention , 1999 .

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  One Hundred Years of Forgetting : A Quantitative Description of Retention , 1996 .

[5]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Response speed changes in an Estes' paired-associate “miniature” experiment , 1963 .

[7]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[8]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Response latency and response accuracy as measures of memory , 1984 .

[9]  E. Tarnow How Dreams and Memory May Be Related , 2003 .

[10]  R. Millward Latency in a modified paired-associate learning experiment , 1964 .

[11]  T. Brashers-Krug,et al.  Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[13]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[14]  N. Cowan Activation, attention, and short-term memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[15]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[16]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[17]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  M. Usher,et al.  The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. , 2005, Psychological review.