Fabrication of Hydrogels with Steep Stiffness Gradients for Studying Cell Mechanical Response

Many fundamental cell processes, such as angiogenesis, neurogenesis and cancer metastasis, are thought to be modulated by extracellular matrix stiffness. Thus, the availability of matrix substrates having well-defined stiffness profiles can be of great importance in biophysical studies of cell-substrate interaction. Here, we present a method to fabricate biocompatible hydrogels with a well defined and linear stiffness gradient. This method, involving the photopolymerization of films by progressively uncovering an acrylamide/bis-acrylamide solution initially covered with an opaque mask, can be easily implemented with common lab equipment. It produces linear stiffness gradients of at least 115 kPa/mm, extending from ∼1 kPa to 240 kPa (in units of Young's modulus). Hydrogels with less steep gradients and narrower stiffness ranges can easily be produced. The hydrogels can be covalently functionalized with uniform coatings of proteins that promote cell adhesion. Cell spreading on these hydrogels linearly correlates with hydrogel stiffness, indicating that this technique effectively modifies the mechanical environment of living cells. This technique provides a simple approach that produces steeper gradients, wider rigidity ranges, and more accurate profiles than current methods.

[1]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. , 2007, Soft matter.

[2]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[3]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Rigidity Sensing at the Leading Edge through αvβ3 Integrins and RPTPα , 2006 .

[6]  P. Janmey,et al.  Polyacrylamide hydrogels for cell mechanics: steps toward optimization and alternative uses. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[7]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Directed Movement of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on Gradient-Compliant Hydrogels† , 2003 .

[8]  Patrick W Oakes,et al.  Preparation of complaint matrices for quantifying cellular contraction. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Spatially controlled hydrogel mechanics to modulate stem cell interactions , 2010 .

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Butt,et al.  Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy , 1995 .

[12]  Peter M. Johnson,et al.  High throughput kinetic analysis of photopolymer conversion using composition and exposure time gradients , 2005 .

[13]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[14]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[15]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[16]  P. A. Dimilla,et al.  Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Stiffness Gradients Mimicking In Vivo Tissue Variation Regulate Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  S. Ostrovidov,et al.  Gradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[20]  S. Kidoaki,et al.  Elasticity boundary conditions required for cell mechanotaxis on microelastically-patterned gels. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[21]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[22]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[23]  A. Engler,et al.  Photopolymerization in Microfluidic Gradient Generators: Microscale Control of Substrate Compliance to Manipulate Cell Response , 2004 .

[24]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[25]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alphavbeta3 integrins and RPTPalpha. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[26]  R. Ross,et al.  Coordinate morphological and biochemical interconversion of human neuroblastoma cells. , 1983, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[28]  I. Pastan,et al.  Functional characterization of a glycine 185-to-valine substitution in human P-glycoprotein by using a vaccinia-based transient expression system. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[29]  N. Gavara,et al.  Probing mechanical properties of living cells by atomic force microscopy with blunted pyramidal cantilever tips. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[31]  P. Arratia,et al.  Absence of filamin A prevents cells from responding to stiffness gradients on gels coated with collagen but not fibronectin. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[32]  R. Ehman,et al.  MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.