Nanog Fluctuations in Embryonic Stem Cells Highlight the Problem of Measurement in Cell Biology

A number of important pluripotency regulators, including the transcription factor Nanog, are observed to fluctuate stochastically in individual embryonic stem cells. By transiently priming cells for commitment to different lineages, these fluctuations are thought to be important to the maintenance of, and exit from, pluripotency. However, because temporal changes in intracellular protein abundances cannot be measured directly in live cells, fluctuations are typically assessed using genetically engineered reporter cell lines that produce a fluorescent signal as a proxy for protein expression. Here, using a combination of mathematical modeling and experiment, we show that there are unforeseen ways in which widely used reporter strategies can systematically disturb the dynamics they are intended to monitor, sometimes giving profoundly misleading results. In the case of Nanog, we show how genetic reporters can compromise the behavior of important pluripotency-sustaining positive feedback loops, and induce a bifurcation in the underlying dynamics that gives rise to heterogeneous Nanog expression patterns in reporter cell lines that are not representative of the wild-type. These findings help explain the range of published observations of Nanog variability and highlight the problem of measurement in live cells.

[1]  E. Snapp,et al.  Design and Use of Fluorescent Fusion Proteins in Cell Biology , 2005, Current protocols in cell biology.

[2]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Molecular cell.

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Julianne D. Halley,et al.  A General Model for Binary Cell Fate Decision Gene Circuits with Degeneracy: Indeterminacy and Switch Behavior in the Absence of Cooperativity , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Martin Chalfie,et al.  Green fluorescent protein : properties, applications, and protocols , 2005 .

[6]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[8]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog , 2012, Nature.

[9]  D. Henrique,et al.  Generation and Characterization of a Novel Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Line with a Dynamic Reporter of Nanog Expression , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Avi Ma’ayan,et al.  Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  H. Niwa,et al.  Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture , 2008, Development.

[12]  Marc S. Sherman,et al.  Cell-to-cell variability in the propensity to transcribe explains correlated fluctuations in gene expression. , 2015, Cell systems.

[13]  J. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2003, Nature.

[14]  Pablo R. Freire,et al.  Single-cell analysis of transcription kinetics across the cell cycle , 2015, eLife.

[15]  Gene-Wei Li,et al.  Central dogma at the single-molecule level in living cells , 2011, Nature.

[16]  P. Cahan,et al.  Origins and implications of pluripotent stem cell variability and heterogeneity , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[18]  J. R. Chubb,et al.  Multiple cell and population-level interactions with mouse embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2015, Development.

[19]  Ge Guo,et al.  Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State , 2009, Cell.

[20]  S. Orkin,et al.  An Extended Transcriptional Network for Pluripotency of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[21]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Single-cell analysis reveals that expression of nanog is biallelic and equally variable as that of other pluripotency factors in mouse ESCs. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[22]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[23]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Nature.

[24]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software , 2011, Bioinform..

[26]  Stuart H. Orkin,et al.  A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature.

[27]  F. Tang,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[28]  S. Emmott,et al.  Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency , 2014, Science.

[29]  Heiko Lickert,et al.  Biallelic expression of nanog protein in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[30]  M. Loeffler,et al.  Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. , 1990, Development.

[31]  Jeffrey D. Scargle.  Studies in Astronomical Time Series Analysis: V. Bayesian Blocks, A New Method to Analyze Structure in , 1998 .

[32]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[34]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[35]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  Entropy Inference and the James-Stein Estimator, with Application to Nonlinear Gene Association Networks , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  Andrew Mugler,et al.  Analytic methods for modeling stochastic regulatory networks. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[37]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2010 .

[38]  U. Alon.  An introduction to systems biology : design principles of biological circuits , 2019 .

[39]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Transcription factor heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells: a stochastic advantage , 2014, Development.

[40]  M. Babu,et al.  Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[41]  Tetsushi Sakuma,et al.  Stochastic promoter activation affects Nanog expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[42]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[43]  John T. Lis,et al.  Getting up to speed with transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  M. J. Cormier,et al.  Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. , 1992, Gene.

[46]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[47]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  The cyclic gene Hes1 contributes to diverse differentiation responses of embryonic stem cells. , 2009, Genes & development.

[48]  Simon Saunders,et al.  What is the Problem of Measurement , 1994 .

[49]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[50]  R. Bhadra,et al.  NIH Public Access , 2014 .

[51]  R. Singer,et al.  Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene , 2006, Current Biology.

[52]  M. Tada,et al.  Pluripotential competence of cells associated with Nanog activity , 2005, Mechanisms of Development.

[53]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Using CellProfiler for Automatic Identification and Measurement of Biological Objects in Images , 2008, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[54]  Jianlong Wang,et al.  Concise Review: Pursuing Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency with the Stem Cell Factor Nanog , 2013, Stem cells.

[55]  Joshua M Brickman,et al.  Gene expression heterogeneities in embryonic stem cell populations: origin and function. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[56]  Huimin Chen,et al.  Transcription Dynamics in Living Cells. , 2016, Annual review of biophysics.

[57]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of information theory (2. ed.) , 2006 .

[58]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Functional Heterogeneity of Embryonic Stem Cells Revealed through Translational Amplification of an Early Endodermal Transcript , 2010, PLoS biology.

[59]  J. Utikal,et al.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[60]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2007, Nature.

[61]  B. Séraphin,et al.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[62]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[63]  F. Hayot,et al.  Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[64]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[65]  J. Scargle.  Bayesian Blocks, A New Method to Analyze Structure in Photon Counting Data , 1997, astro-ph/9711233.

[66]  S. Orkin,et al.  Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .

[68]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[69]  J. Paulsson.  Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.

[70]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[71]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[72]  A. Puliafito,et al.  Heterogeneities in Nanog Expression Drive Stable Commitment to Pluripotency in the Mouse Blastocyst. , 2015, Cell reports.

[73]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[74]  M. Chalfie,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. , 1994, Science.

[75]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[76]  Petr Svoboda,et al.  Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency , 2014, Development.