PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans

Much research indicates that East Asians, more than Americans, explain events with reference to the context. The authors examined whether East Asians also attend to the context more than Americans do. In Study 1, Japanese and Americans watched animated vignettes of underwater scenes and reported the contents. In a subsequent recognition test, they were shown previously seen objects as well as new objects, either in their original setting or in novel settings, and then were asked to judge whether they had seen the objects. Study 2 replicated the recognition task using photographs of wildlife. The results showed that the Japanese (a) made more statements about contextual information and relationships than Americans did and (b) recognized previously seen objects more accurately when they saw them in their original settings rather than in the novel settings, whereas this manipulation had relatively little effect on Americans.

[1]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Running Head: CULTURE AND THOUGHT Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition , 2001 .

[3]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Causal Cognition , 2000 .

[4]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The Perceiver as Perceived: Everyday Intuitions About the Correspondence Bias , 1999 .

[6]  Twila Tardif,et al.  Putting the "Noun Bias" in Context: A Comparison of English and Mandarin. , 1999 .

[7]  Incheol Choi,et al.  Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and situations. , 1999 .

[8]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. , 1999 .

[9]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Situational Salience and Cultural Differences in the Correspondence Bias and Actor-Observer Bias , 1998 .

[10]  M. Hallahan,et al.  Explaining Real-Life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributions , 1996 .

[11]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[12]  T. Tardif.  Nouns are not always learned before verbs : Evidence from Mandarin speakers' early vocabularies , 1996 .

[13]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[15]  A. Fernald,et al.  Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. , 1993, Child development.

[16]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[17]  M. Siegal,et al.  Do people believe behaviours are consistent with attitudes? Towards a cultural psychology of attribution processes. , 1992 .

[18]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new , 1989 .

[19]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Perceiver-Induced Constraint: Interpretations of Self-Generated Reality , 1986 .

[20]  J. G. Miller.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity Versus Natural Partitioning. Technical Report No. 257. , 1982 .

[22]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The rocky road from acts to dispositions. , 1979, The American psychologist.

[23]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[25]  L. Ross.  The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[26]  John W. Berry,et al.  Psychological Differentiation in Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1975 .

[27]  L. Chiu.  A CROSS‐CULTURAL COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE STYLES IN CHINESE AND AMERICAN CHILDREN , 1972 .

[28]  V. A. Harris,et al.  The Attribution of Attitudes , 1967 .

[29]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[30]  T. Abel,et al.  Some aspects of personality of Chinese as revealed by the Rorschach test. , 1949, Rorschach research exchange and journal of projective techniques.