Selection Model of

We present a mathematical formulation of a theory of language change. The theory is evolutionary in nature and has close analogies with theories of population genetics. The mathematical structure we construct similarly has correspondences with the Fisher-Wright model of population genetics, but there are significant differences. The continuous time formulation of the model is expressed in terms of a Fokker-Planck equation. This equation is exactly soluble in the case of a single speaker and can be investigated analytically in the case of multiple speakers who communicate equally with all other speakers and give their utterances equal weight. Whilst the stationary properties of this system have much in common with the single-speaker case, time-dependent properties are richer. In the particular case where linguistic forms can become extinct, we find that the presence of many speakers causes a two-stage relaxation, the first being a common marginal distribution that persists for a long time as a consequence of ultimate extinction being due to rare fluctuations.

[1]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[2]  S. Wright.  Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[3]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  Random processes in genetics , 1958, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[4]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[5]  T. Ohta,et al.  The Average Number of Generations until Fixation of a Mutant Gene in a Finite Population. , 1969, Genetics.

[6]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[7]  Lesley Milroy,et al.  Language and social networks , 1980 .

[8]  J. Kingman.  On the genealogy of large populations , 1982 .

[9]  C. Gardiner.  Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[10]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  The Production of Speech , 2011, Springer New York.

[11]  H. Risken.  Fokker-Planck Equation , 1984 .

[12]  David L. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[13]  N. Takahata.  Genealogy of neutral genes and spreading of selected mutations in a geographically structured population. , 1991, Genetics.

[14]  Eugene A. Feinberg.  Journal of Applied Probability 31, 262-267, 1994 , 1994 .

[15]  W. Labov.  Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[16]  Rudi Keller,et al.  On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language , 1994 .

[17]  W. Bruce Croft.  On language change: The invisible hand in language , 1997 .

[18]  Partha Niyogi,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Language Learning , 1997 .

[19]  D. Hull.  Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science , 2000 .

[20]  R. Buerger.  The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation , 2000 .

[21]  M A Nowak,et al.  Evolution of universal grammar. , 2001, Science.

[22]  James F. Crow,et al.  The beanbag lives on , 2001, Nature.

[23]  S. Mufwene.  The ecology of language evolution , 2001 .

[24]  A. Monaco,et al.  Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language , 2002, Nature.

[25]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach , 2002 .

[26]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The Darwinization of Linguistics , 2002 .

[27]  Peter Gilles,et al.  Identification of Regional Varieties by Intonational Cues , 2002, Language and speech.

[28]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Natural Language From Artificial Life , 2002, Artificial Life.

[29]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Linguistics: Modelling the dynamics of language death , 2003, Nature.

[30]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Language dynamics in finite populations. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The Effects of Genetic and Geographic Structure on Neutral Variation , 2003 .

[32]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.

[33]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language Evolution: The Hardest Problem in Science? , 2003 .

[34]  P. Trudgill,et al.  New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution , 2004 .

[35]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Win–stay, lose–shift in language learning from peers , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  P. Trudgill.  Book Note: New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes , 2004 .

[37]  Joan Bybee.  Joan Bybee: Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.

[38]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[39]  Lyle Jenkins,et al.  Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics , 2004 .

[40]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[41]  J. W. Minett,et al.  The invasion of language: emergence, change and death. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  Greece,et al.  Language evolution and population dynamics in a system of two interacting species , 2005, cond-mat/0502118.

[43]  Michael Cysouw,et al.  [Review of] Explaining language change : an evolutionary approach / William Croft. - Harlow: Pearson Education 2000, XV, 287 S. (Longman Linguistics Library) , 2006 .