Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design

Living Labs have received limited attention in the literature despite their diffusion throughout Europe and recent interest from policy makers. This limited attention is linked to the newness of the phenomenon, the high heterogeneity of cases and the consequent lack of definitions and acknowledged frameworks for scholarly analyses. In this work, we argue that the originality of the Living Lab phenomenon resides in the introduction of a new methodology. Using an analysis of the literature and case studies, we propose a new definition, position this methodology among other design methodologies and highlight its peculiarities. We underline the co-creative potentialities, the awareness of users and the real-life settings. Furthermore, our case-based research allows us to identify four different specifications for this methodology, and therefore four different types of Living Labs, based on the openness of the user involvement and the adopted platform technology.

[1]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[2]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[3]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[4]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[5]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[6]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[7]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[8]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[9]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Putting ethnography to work: the case for a cognitive ethnography of design , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Virtuosos of the Experience Domain , 2001 .

[11]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2001) 247–257 PERSPECTIVE: User toolkits for innovation , 2022 .

[12]  Le nuove sfide per l’innovazione di prodotti e servizi , 2001 .

[13]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  User toolkits for innovation , 2001 .

[14]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  From user-centered to participatory design approaches , 2002 .

[15]  R.I. Sutton The weird rules of creativity , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  Sharon Poggenpohl,et al.  User-Centered Innovation: The Interplay between User-Research and Design Innovation , 2002 .

[17]  M. Einhorn Art as Innovation , 2002 .

[18]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  The Customer Centric Enterprise , 2003 .

[19]  R. Jacobson,et al.  Trading off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis , 2003 .

[20]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  The Power of Innomediation , 2003 .

[21]  M. Rouse,et al.  The Customer Centric Enterprise : Advances in Mass Customization and Personalization , 2003 .

[22]  K. Seltman Marketing for management. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[23]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[24]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[25]  Gabriella Lojacono,et al.  The Evolution of the Design-Inspired Enterprise , 2004 .

[26]  M. Eriksson State-ofthe-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach , 2005 .

[27]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation: Examining European Practice , 2005 .

[28]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[29]  Brigitte Borja de Mozota,et al.  The Impact of User‐Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships* , 2005 .

[30]  Eduardo Corte-Real,et al.  Design Research in 2006 , 2006 .

[31]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences* , 2006 .

[32]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[33]  Tünde Kállai,et al.  State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation – Automotive, Rural, eEngineering and Renewable Energy LLs in Hungary , 2006 .

[34]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[35]  Riccardo Vecchiato,et al.  A new methodology for regional foresight , 2007 .

[36]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  FormIT : an approach to user involvement , 2008 .

[37]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[38]  G. Pisano Which kind of collaboration is right for you , 2009 .

[39]  Niklas Z. Kviselius,et al.  Living Labs as Tools for Open Innovation , 2009 .

[40]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  A milieu for innovation : defining living labs , 2009 .

[41]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders CONVERGING PERSPECTIVES: Product Development Research for the 1990s , 2010 .

[42]  Dev Patnaik,et al.  Needfinding: The Why and How of Uncovering People's Needs , 2010 .

[43]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Product Development - Managing a Dispersed Process by , 2011 .

[44]  James O Prochaska,et al.  A discussion with James O. Prochaska, PhD. Interview by Paul E. Terry. , 2012, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[45]  Sascha Kraus,et al.  Facilitating SME Innovation Capability Through Business Networking , 2012 .

[46]  P. Ballon,et al.  Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel-centered Living Lab-approach , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies.

[47]  Matti Hämäläinen,et al.  From Web 2.0 to Living Lab: an Exploration of the Evolved Innovation Principles , 2012 .

[48]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .