Failure Investigation of LiFePO4 Cells in Over-Discharge Conditions

The failure mechanism of LiFePO4 cells in over-discharge conditions has been systematically studied using commercial A123 18650 cells at a 1.0 C rate and different conditions – from 5% to 20% over-discharge (DOD = 105% to 120%). SEM/EDAX, high-energy synchrotron XRD (HESXRD), and cyclic voltammetry (CV) were used to characterize the morphology, structure, and electrode potentials of cell components both in situ and ex situ. The failure behaviors of A123 18650 cells experiencing different degrees of over-discharge were found to be similar, and the 20% over-discharge process was analyzed as the representative example. The Cu electrochemical potentials in the 1.2 M LiPF6 EC/EMC electrolyte were measured during the charge/over-discharge process using CV, proving that Cu oxidation and reduction in the cell during the charge/over-discharge cycle were theoretically possible to proceed. A possible failure mechanism is proposed: during the over-discharging process, Cu foil oxidized first to Cu+ ,t hen to Cu 2+ cations; next, these Cu+ and Cu2+ cations diffused to the cathode side from the anode side; and finally, these Cu2+ cations reduced to Cu+ cations, and then reduced further, back to metallic Cu. During charge/over-discharge cycling, Cu dendrites continued growing from the cathode side, penetrating through the separator and forming a copper bridge between the anode and cathode. The copper bridge caused micro-shorting and eventually led to the failure of the cell. During the charge/over-discharge cycles, the continued cell

[1]  T. P. Kumar,et al.  Safety mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries , 2006 .

[2]  Yuichi Sato,et al.  Overcharge reaction of lithium-ion batteries , 2005 .

[3]  Gan Ning,et al.  Capacity fade study of lithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge rates , 2003 .

[4]  Julien Demeaux,et al.  LiNi0.4Mn1.6O4/Electrolyte and Carbon Black/Electrolyte High Voltage Interfaces: To Evidence the Chemical and Electronic Contributions of the Solvent on the Cathode-Electrolyte Interface Formation , 2012 .

[5]  Ralph E. White,et al.  Capacity Fade Mechanisms and Side Reactions in Lithium‐Ion Batteries , 1998 .

[6]  Raouf O. Loutfy,et al.  Comparative studies of MCMB and CC composite as anodes for lithium-ion battery systems , 2003 .

[7]  M. Whittingham,et al.  Lithium batteries and cathode materials. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[8]  Ken Darcovich,et al.  Modelling the impact of variations in electrode manufacturing on lithium-ion battery modules , 2012 .

[9]  N. Demirdöven,et al.  Hybrid Cars Now, Fuel Cell Cars Later , 2004, Science.

[10]  H. Maleki,et al.  Internal short circuit in Li-ion cells , 2009 .

[11]  T. Abe,et al.  Electrochemical AFM Observation of the HOPG Edge Plane in Ethylene Carbonate-Based Electrolytes Containing Film-Forming Additives , 2012 .

[12]  Nae-Lih Wu,et al.  Study on dynamics of structural transformation during charge/discharge of LiFePO4 cathode , 2008 .

[13]  J. Yamaki,et al.  Lithium Ion Cell Safety , 2000 .

[14]  A. P. Hammersley,et al.  Two-dimensional detector software: From real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan , 1996 .

[15]  Matthieu Dubarry,et al.  Origins and accommodation of cell variations in Li‐ion battery pack modeling , 2010 .