An active learning method combining adaptive kriging and weighted penalty for structural reliability analysis

Reducing the surrogate model-based method computation without loss of prediction accuracy remains a significant challenge in structural reliability analysis. The unbalanced probability density, important information in critical region and information redundancy of added sample points are ignored in most of traditional surrogate-based methods, resulting in heavy computational burden. In this work, an active learning combining adaptive Kriging method and weighted penalty (AK-WP) is proposed to analyze the reliability of engineering structures. Firstly, an active learning and weighted penalty function (WPLF) is the result of integrating active learning method, weighted function and penalty function, which is proposed to find the most probable point (MPP). Meanwhile, to avoid redundant information, the best suitable MPP is determined by a proposed distance law established between the found MPP and the existing design of experiment (DoE). Secondly, the Kriging model is refined according to best suitable MPP in each iteration. Thirdly, the failure probability is estimated by the Monte Carlo sample points from the n-ball domain until the convergence condition is satisfied. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method are demonstrated by some numerical examples including the highly nonlinear, the small probability problems and implicit function, as well as a real engineering application.

[1]  Jie Liu,et al.  Time-Variant Reliability Analysis through Response Surface Method , 2017 .

[2]  J.-M. Bourinet,et al.  Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  B. Keshtegar,et al.  A hybrid self-adaptive conjugate first order reliability method for robust structural reliability analysis , 2018 .

[4]  Xu Li,et al.  A sequential surrogate method for reliability analysis based on radial basis function , 2018, Structural Safety.

[5]  B. Ellingwood,et al.  Directional methods for structural reliability analysis , 2000 .

[6]  Liang Gao,et al.  An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Jungho Kim,et al.  Probability-Adaptive Kriging in n-Ball (PAK-Bn) for reliability analysis , 2020 .

[8]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Ziqi Wang,et al.  Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods for Subset Simulation in reliability analysis , 2017, Structural Safety.

[10]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Gang Li,et al.  An active weight learning method for efficient reliability assessment with small failure probability , 2020 .

[12]  OngYew-Soon,et al.  A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design , 2018 .

[13]  Liang Gao,et al.  A novel projection outline based active learning method and its combination with Kriging metamodel for hybrid reliability analysis with random and interval variables , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[14]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  AKOIS: An adaptive Kriging oriented importance sampling method for structural system reliability analysis , 2020 .

[15]  Fan Yang,et al.  Multidisciplinary reliability analysis of turbine blade with shape uncertainty by Kriging model and free-form deformation methods , 2020 .

[16]  Liang Gao,et al.  A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Yishang Zhang,et al.  Probability and convex set hybrid reliability analysis based on active learning Kriging model , 2015 .

[18]  Weidong Chen,et al.  AK-MSS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for small failure probabilities , 2020 .

[19]  Zhen Hu,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis , 2016 .

[20]  J. Wiart,et al.  Polynomial-Chaos-based Kriging , 2015, 1502.03939.

[21]  Wafa Nor El Houda Cherifi,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of consolidation problems using subset simulation , 2020 .

[22]  Haitao Liu,et al.  A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design , 2017, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[23]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A novel support vector regression method for online reliability prediction under multi-state varying operating conditions , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Bo Yu,et al.  An importance learning method for non-probabilistic reliability analysis and optimization , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[25]  G. Tsiatas,et al.  Reliability analysis of the hysteretic nonlinear energy sink in shock mitigation considering uncertainties , 2020 .

[26]  Liang Gao,et al.  An efficient Kriging-based subset simulation method for hybrid reliability analysis under random and interval variables with small failure probability , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[27]  Xu Li,et al.  RBF-GA: An adaptive radial basis function metamodeling with genetic algorithm for structural reliability analysis , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Yuting Yang,et al.  Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of extremely rare failure events by combining sampling and surrogate model methods , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability.

[29]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Yan Dong,et al.  Time-variant fatigue reliability assessment of welded joints based on the PHI2 and response surface methods , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Tom Dhaene,et al.  Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Jie Li,et al.  Probability density evolution method: Background, significance and recent developments , 2016 .

[33]  Yan Shi,et al.  A novel learning function based on Kriging for reliability analysis , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  S. Marelli,et al.  An active-learning algorithm that combines sparse polynomial chaos expansions and bootstrap for structural reliability analysis , 2017, Structural Safety.

[35]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[36]  Xu Han,et al.  A Moment Approach to Positioning Accuracy Reliability Analysis for Industrial Robots , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[37]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems , 2007 .

[38]  Hui Li,et al.  An active learning method combining deep neural network and weighted sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2020 .

[39]  Pan Wang,et al.  A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering , 2015, Comput. Math. Appl..

[40]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[41]  Zeyu Wang,et al.  REAK: Reliability analysis through Error rate-based Adaptive Kriging , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[42]  Stefano Marelli,et al.  Rare Event Estimation Using Polynomial-Chaos Kriging , 2017 .

[43]  George Stefanou,et al.  Stochastic finite element analysis of composite structures based on mesoscale random fields of material properties , 2017 .

[44]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Reliability analysis with Metamodel Line Sampling , 2016 .

[45]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[47]  Rafael H. Lopez,et al.  A general RBDO decoupling approach for different reliability analysis methods , 2016 .

[48]  Liangli He,et al.  An efficient computational method for estimating failure credibility by combining genetic algorithm and active learning Kriging , 2020 .

[49]  Zeng Meng,et al.  An active learning method combining Kriging and accelerated chaotic single loop approach (AK-ACSLA) for reliability-based design optimization , 2019 .

[50]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2016 .

[51]  G. Meng,et al.  Hybrid structure reliability analysis based on the damped Newton method , 2020 .

[52]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  AK-SYSi: an improved adaptive Kriging model for system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes by a refined U learning function , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[53]  Shun-Peng Zhu,et al.  Novel probabilistic model for searching most probable point in structural reliability analysis , 2020 .

[54]  Yu Liu,et al.  Reliability-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Using Subset Simulation Analysis and Its Application in the Hydraulic Transmission Mechanism Design , 2014 .

[55]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[56]  Liang Gao,et al.  A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[57]  Beibei Sun,et al.  An active learning reliability method with multiple kernel functions based on radial basis function , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.