Project-based learning in a virtual internship programme: A study of the interrelated roles between intern, mentor and client

The purpose of this study was to analyse how the interrelationships of interns, clients and mentors lead to success in a project-based learning design virtual internship program. Interns from eleven different university programmes were asked to apply their academic experiences in constructing real projects for clients using a virtual environment while under the supervision of mentors. Data included completed intern projects, intern journals, and mentor and client evaluations. Data were collected over five cohorts, from forty-two cases, six of which are highlighted in this study. Programme design, mentor and client training, and intern performance, are considered. Findings demonstrate that interrelated roles evolve during the virtual internship and project success is related to the co-construction of knowledge between the intern, mentor and client. The study of the functions of these roles leads to implications for the design, development and implementation of a successful virtual internship programme. PBL virtual internships support interrelated roles between intern, mentor and client.Project success is related to the connection between the roles.Co-construction of knowledge is supported through interrelationships.Attributes of related roles are found in successful project teams.

[1]  William Winn,et al.  Instructional Design and Situated Learning: Paradox or Partnership?. , 1993 .

[2]  Helen Beetham,et al.  Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age , 2007 .

[3]  Chuck Hodell,et al.  ISD From The Ground Up: A No-Nonsense Approach to Instructional Design , 2005 .

[4]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[5]  Paul D. Eggen,et al.  Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms , 1998 .

[6]  Raija Hämäläinen,et al.  Education and working life: VET adults' problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[7]  W. B. Russell,et al.  Virtually Ready? Pre-service teachers' perceptions of a virtual internship experience , 2016 .

[8]  H. Schmidt,et al.  The psychological basis of problem‐based learning: a review of the evidence , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[10]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[11]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration , 2000 .

[12]  Rhona Sharpe,et al.  Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age , 2007 .

[13]  Elizabeth J. Whitt.  “Hit the Ground Running”: Experiences of New Faculty in a School of Education , 2017 .

[14]  J. Dewey.  Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[15]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Using blogs to support learning during internship , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[16]  John R. Savery,et al.  Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. , 2006 .

[17]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[18]  Christophe Kolski,et al.  Framework for the evolution of acquiring knowledge modules to integrate the acquisition of high-level cognitive skills and professional competencies: Principles and case studies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[19]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[20]  David Royse,et al.  Program Evaluation: An Introduction to an Evidence-Based Approach , 2015 .

[21]  Suzie Boss,et al.  Reinventing Project-Based Learning: Your Field Guide to Real-World Projects in the Digital Age , 2008 .

[22]  Derrick McIver,et al.  Instructional Design as Knowledge Management , 2016 .

[23]  M. Miles,et al.  Data management and analysis methods. , 1994 .

[24]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Effects of model persistence and statements of confidence on children's self-efficacy and problem solving. , 1981 .

[25]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Student-Centered Learning Environments: Foundations, Assumptions, and Implications. , 1996 .

[26]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[27]  Amy C. Bradshaw,et al.  Project-based learning in an internship program: A qualitative study of related roles and their motivational attributes , 2008 .

[28]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other , 2014 .

[29]  Cynthia S. Johnson,et al.  PROJECT-BASED LEARNING AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT , 2013 .

[30]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen's vision of authentic technology-enabled learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Elizabeth Boling,et al.  Development of Design Judgment in Instructional Design: Perspectives from Instructors, Students, and Instructional Designers , 2014 .

[32]  D. Ruggiero,et al.  Design and Development of a Learning Design Virtual Internship Program , 2016 .

[33]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[34]  E. Guba,et al.  Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. , 1982 .

[35]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[36]  T Male.  Analysing qualitative data , 2015 .

[37]  Susan M. Land,et al.  The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments , 1997 .

[38]  Javier Onrubia,et al.  Work coordination and collaborative knowledge construction in a small group collaborative virtual task , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[39]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Teaching for Understanding , 1997 .

[40]  Cynthia Geer,et al.  Teaching for Understanding , 1990 .

[41]  S. Straus,et al.  Characteristics of Successful and Failed Mentoring Relationships: A Qualitative Study Across Two Academic Health Centers , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[42]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  A model for understanding formative evaluation in instructional design , 1995 .

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[44]  A. Kitsantas,et al.  Supporting Student Self-Regulated Learning in Problem-and Project-Based Learning. , 2013 .

[45]  Germán Moltó,et al.  Virtualized Computational Environments on the cloud to foster group skills through PBL: A case study in architecture , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Roger Bruning,et al.  Cognitive psychology for teachers , 1990 .

[47]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[48]  Gillian Oliver,et al.  Experiential learning and international collaboration opportunities: virtual internships , 2012 .

[49]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web , 1997 .

[50]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry , 1992 .

[51]  Paulette Robinson,et al.  Faculty development for Web-based teaching: weaving pedagogy with skills training , 2000 .

[52]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitativeresearch [Glaser, 1968] , 1968 .

[53]  Trina Fyfe,et al.  Building capacity in systematic review searching: a pilot program using virtual mentoring , 2014 .

[54]  M. Tessmer.  Subject specialist consultation in instructional design: Higher education , 1988 .

[55]  Julie McLeod,et al.  Opening The Door: An evaluation of the efficacy of a problem-based learning game , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Albert Bandura,et al.  On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited , 2012 .

[57]  Michael D. McNeese,et al.  A Situated Cognition Approach to Problem Solving with Implications for Computer-Based Learning and Assessment , 1993, HCI.

[58]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .