An ordinal optimization theory-based algorithm for solving the optimal power flow problem with discrete control variables

The optimal power flow (OPF) problem with discrete control variables is an NP-hard problem in its exact formulation. To cope with the immense computational-difficulty of this problem, we propose an ordinal optimization theory-based algorithm to solve for a good enough solution with high probability. Aiming for hard optimization problems, the ordinal optimization theory, in contrast to heuristic methods, guarantee to provide a top n% solution among all with probability more than 0.95. The approach of our ordinal optimization theory-based algorithm consists of three stages. First, select heuristically a large set of candidate solutions. Then, use a simplified model to select a subset of most promising solutions. Finally, evaluate the candidate promising-solutions of the reduced subset using the exact model. We have demonstrated the computational efficiency of our algorithm and the quality of the obtained solution by comparing with the competing methods and the conventional approach through simulations.

[1]  Y. C. Wu Fuzzy Second Correction on the Complementary Condition for Optimal Power Flows , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  David Sun,et al.  Experiences with implementing optimal power flow for reactive scheduling in the Taiwan power system , 1988 .

[3]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  Optimal Power Flow by Enhanced Genetic Algorithm , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[4]  H. Happ,et al.  Quadratically Convergent Optimal Power Flow , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  David L. Farnsworth Introduction to Statistics: The Nonparametric Way , 1992 .

[6]  A. G. Bakirtzis,et al.  Incorporation of Switching Operations in Power System Corrective Control Computations , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  W. Tinney,et al.  Optimal Power Flow By Newton Approach , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[8]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Adaptive movement penalty method for the Newton optimal power , 1991, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[9]  W. Tinney,et al.  Discrete Shunt Controls in Newton Optimal Power Flow , 1992, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[10]  W. F. Tinney,et al.  Some deficiencies in optimal power flow , 1988 .

[11]  A. H. Mantawy,et al.  Unit commitment by tabu search , 1998 .

[12]  Sarosh N. Talukdar,et al.  Quasi-Newton method for optimal power flows , 1981 .

[13]  T. W. E. Lau,et al.  Universal Alignment Probabilities and Subset Selection for Ordinal Optimization , 1997 .

[14]  Y. Ho,et al.  Universal Alignment Probability Revisited , 2002 .

[15]  O. Alsac,et al.  Review Of Linear Programming Applied To Power System Rescheduling , 1979 .

[16]  G. L. Torres,et al.  On a nonlinear multiple-centrality-corrections interior-point method for optimal power flow , 2001 .

[17]  Shin-Yeu Lin,et al.  A new dual-type method used in solving optimal power flow problems , 1997 .

[18]  Sarosh Talukdar,et al.  A Fast and Robust Variable Metric Method for Optimum Power Flows , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[19]  B Stott,et al.  Linear Programming for Power-System Network Security Applications , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[20]  O. Alsac,et al.  Security analysis and optimization , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  R. E. Marsten,et al.  A direct nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows , 1993 .

[22]  Shin-Yeu Lin,et al.  A computationally efficient method for nonlinear multicommodity network flow problems , 1997, Networks.

[23]  Loi Lei Lai,et al.  Evolutionary programming approach to reactive power planning , 1996 .

[24]  Luonan Chen,et al.  Mean field theory for optimal power flow , 1997 .