Space Weather Modeling Capabilities Assessment: Auroral Precipitation and High‐Latitude Ionospheric Electrodynamics

As part of its International Capabilities Assessment effort, the Community Coordinated Modeling Center initiated several working teams, one of which is focused on the validation of models and methods for determining auroral electrodynamic parameters, including particle precipitation, conductivities, electric fields, neutral density and winds, currents, Joule heating, auroral boundaries, and ion outflow. Auroral electrodynamic properties are needed as input to space weather models, to test and validate the accuracy of physical models, and to provide needed information for space weather customers and researchers. The working team developed a process for validating auroral electrodynamic quantities that begins with the selection of a set of events, followed by construction of ground truth databases using all available data and assimilative data analysis techniques. Using optimized, predefined metrics, the ground truth data for selected events can be used to assess model performance and improvement over time. The availability of global observations and sophisticated data assimilation techniques provides the means to create accurate ground truth databases routinely and accurately.

[1]  Michael Wiltberger,et al.  Structure of High Latitude Currents in Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Models , 2016 .

[2]  Robert R. Meier,et al.  Initial observations with the Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) in the NASA TIMED satellite mission , 2003 .

[3]  A. Mannucci,et al.  Estimation of energy budget of ionosphere-thermosphere system during two CIR-HSS events: observations and modeling , 2016 .

[4]  R. Redmon,et al.  A new DMSP magnetometer and auroral boundary data set and estimates of field‐aligned currents in dynamic auroral boundary coordinates , 2017, Journal of geophysical research. Space physics.

[5]  Brian J. Anderson,et al.  Sensing global Birkeland currents with iridium® engineering magnetometer data , 2000 .

[6]  Yuki Kubo,et al.  Verification of operational solar flare forecast: Case of Regional Warning Center Japan , 2017, 1707.07903.

[7]  G. Crowley,et al.  Extended study of extreme geoelectric field event scenarios for geomagnetically induced current applications , 2013 .

[8]  Tomoko Matsuo,et al.  Optimal interpolation analysis of high‐latitude ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductivities: Application to assimilative ionospheric electrodynamics reconstruction , 2016 .

[9]  R. Viereck,et al.  Using citizen science reports to define the equatorial extent of auroral visibility , 2016 .

[10]  Jeffrey P. Thayer,et al.  Height-resolved Joule heating rates in the high-latitude E region , 1998 .

[11]  B. Anderson,et al.  Global evolution of Birkeland currents on 10 min timescales: MHD simulations and observations , 2013 .

[12]  R. Strangeway,et al.  Empirical model of Poynting flux derived from FAST data and a cusp signature , 2014 .

[13]  Larry J. Paxton,et al.  Near real-time assimilation in IRI of auroral peak E-region density and equatorward boundary , 2010 .

[14]  C. Heinselman,et al.  Comparison of AMIE-modeled and Sondrestrom-measured joule heating: A study in model resolution and electric field-conductivity correlation , 2009 .

[15]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  Ionosphere‐thermosphere energy budgets for the ICME storms of March 2013 and 2015 estimated with GITM and observational proxies , 2017 .

[16]  A. H. Murphy Forecast verification: Its Complexity and Dimensionality , 1991 .

[17]  D. T. Welling,et al.  Recommendations for Next‐Generation Ground Magnetic Perturbation Validation , 2018, Space Weather.

[18]  Andrea H. Tapia,et al.  Aurorasaurus: A citizen science platform for viewing and reporting the aurora , 2015 .

[19]  Timothy Fuller-Rowell,et al.  Height-integrated Pedersen and Hall conductivity patterns inferred from the TIROS-NOAA satellite data , 1987 .

[20]  James Westervelt,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines , 2001 .

[21]  E. Kihn,et al.  Vertical thermal O+flows at 850 km in dynamic auroral boundary coordinates , 2010 .

[22]  Daniel T. Welling,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Geomagnetic Index Predictions , 2018, Space Weather.

[23]  M. Freeman,et al.  Estimating the location of the open-closed magnetic field line boundary from auroral images , 2010 .

[24]  B. Anderson,et al.  A global MHD simulation of an event with a quasi-steady northward IMF , 2007 .

[25]  Brian J. Anderson,et al.  Development of large‐scale Birkeland currents determined from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment , 2014 .