Leveraging online social networks for people with disabilities in emergency communications and recovery

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can play an important role in leveraging social networks for emergency communications and recovery involving persons with disabilities, provided that proper consideration is given to the strengths and weaknesses of the distributed nature of online resources in relation to the instrumental, psychological and social needs of persons with disabilities in the context of disasters or other emergency events. Emergency and disaster events inherently involve uncertainty and dynamic risk factors, and pose design and implementation challenges for inclusive planning and delivery systems. The involvement of persons with disabilities as key stakeholders throughout the developmental and evaluation process is critical to the effectiveness of online social networks in bridging real-world concerns with virtual resources. An analytical model for understanding the role of distributed networks in mediating the negative impacts of a disaster or an emergency on persons with disabilities is proposed, together with key objectives for change.

[1]  Nathan W. Moon,et al.  Virtual exclusion and telework: barriers and opportunities of technocentric workplace accommodation policy. , 2006, Work.

[2]  S. Lindgren,et al.  Health promotion for people with disabilities: development and evaluation of the Living Well with a Disability program. , 2006, Health education research.

[3]  Christine E. Myhill.  ICT for access to information services for disabled people: an overview of projects and services at Gateshead Libraries Service , 2002 .

[4]  anthropological Perspectives on Disasters and Disability: an introduction , 2009 .

[5]  Francisco Alcantud Marin,et al.  Web accessibility for individuals with cognitive deficits: A comparative study between an existing commercial Web and its cognitively accessible equivalent , 2007, TCHI.

[6]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Wim Vanderbauwhede,et al.  Communication Challenges in the W3C's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines , 2006 .

[8]  D. Glik.  Risk communication for public health emergencies. , 2007, Annual review of public health.

[9]  M. Keane,et al.  A review of the role of telemedicine in the accident and emergency department , 2009, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

[10]  E. Hargittai,et al.  The disability divide in internet access and use , 2006 .

[11]  Christopher T Born,et al.  Disasters and mass casualties: I. General principles of response and management. , 2007, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[12]  Shane Anderson,et al.  User Needs and e-Government Accessibility: The Future Impact of WCAG 2.0 , 2004, User Interfaces for All.

[13]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Wind, Water, and Wi-Fi: New Trends in Community Informatics and Disaster Management , 2008, Inf. Soc..

[14]  T. Bushnik.  Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care 2002-2007. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Telecommunications policy and individuals with disabilities: Issues of accessibility and social inclusion in the policy and research agenda , 2006 .

[16]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Bo Xie,et al.  The mutual shaping of online and offline social relationships , 2008, Inf. Res..

[18]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  Emergency Information Management and Public Disaster Preparedness: Lessons from the 2004 Florida Hurricane Season , 2008, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[19]  Randal D. Pinkett,et al.  Building Community, Empowerment and Self-sufficiency , 2003 .

[20]  K. Bunning,et al.  Communication and Empowerment: A Place for Rich and Multiple Media? , 2009 .

[21]  M. Devivo.  Sir Ludwig Guttmann Lecture: Trends in spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes from model systems in the United States: 1973–2006 , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[22]  C. Wold,et al.  Differences in individual-level terrorism preparedness in Los Angeles County. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  D. Thorns,et al.  The Role of Information Communications Technology in Retrieving Local Community , 2007 .

[24]  Stephen Fickas,et al.  The longitudinal effects of accessible email for individuals with severe cognitive impairments , 2005 .

[25]  Kirsty Williamson,et al.  Information behavior of people in the fourth age: Implications for the conceptualization of information literacy , 2009 .

[26]  T. L. Williams,et al.  Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  Methods for inclusion: Employing think aloud protocols in software usability studies with individuals who are deaf , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  J. Fernback.  Information technology, networks and community voices , 2005 .

[29]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Successful Design and Uptake of Interactive Systems to Support Social Networks in Urban Neighborhoods , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[30]  Deborah Stienstra,et al.  Engaging Citizens with Disabilities in eDemocracy , 2005 .

[31]  P. Etkind,et al.  Preparing for the usual, preparing for the unusual: ethics in routine and emergency public health practice. , 2008, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[32]  Jane V. Richter,et al.  Evaluation of Online Disaster and Emergency Preparedness Resources , 2008, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[33]  Michael Ashley Stein,et al.  Emergency preparedness and disability. , 2006, Mental and physical disability law reporter.

[34]  Philip Fei Wu,et al.  Community response grids: E-government, social networks, and effective emergency management , 2007 .

[35]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[36]  M. L. Edwards.  An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Disasters and Stress: The Promise of an Ecological Framework , 1998 .

[37]  E. M. Bertera,et al.  A study of the receptivity to telecare technology in a community-based elderly minority population , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[38]  Craig Hayden,et al.  Maintaining the digital hub: locating the community technology center in a communication infrastructure , 2007, New Media Soc..

[39]  E. J. Fuller,et al.  Disaster Care for Persons With Psychiatric Disabilities , 2007 .

[40]  J. DelliFraine,et al.  Home-based telehealth: a review and meta-analysis , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[41]  K. Kim,et al.  Understanding emerging disabilities , 2004 .

[42]  Gunilla C. Nilsson,et al.  Health care consumers' experiences of information communication technology - A summary of literature , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[43]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Media Use and Information Needs of the Disabled During a Natural Disaster , 2007, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[44]  Dawn O. Braithwaite,et al.  How People with Disabilities Communicatively Manage Assistance: Helping as Instrumental Social Support , 2003 .

[45]  Paula K. Dunbar.  Increasing public awareness of natural hazards via the Internet , 2007 .

[46]  Peter Blanck,et al.  Technology for independence: a community-based resource center. , 2003, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[47]  Robert Didden,et al.  Access to and use of Internet by adolescents who have a physical disability: a comparative study. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[48]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  A systematic review of research methodology in telemedicine studies , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[49]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Weak Ties in Networked Communities , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[50]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  The Impact of Time Online: Social Capital and Cyberbalkanization , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[51]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Online Interactions and Social Capital , 2006 .

[52]  Christopher Newell,et al.  The Business of Digital Disability , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[53]  K. Diagne.  Governance and natural disasters: addressing flooding in Saint Louis, Senegal , 2007 .

[54]  Sue Kilpatrick,et al.  Social Capital: an analytical tool for exploring lifelong learning and community development , 2003 .

[55]  Peter Trkman,et al.  A conceptual model for the development of broadband and e-government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[56]  David L. Banks,et al.  Social Network Methodology in the Study of Disasters: Issues and Insights Prompted by Post-Katrina Research , 2009 .

[57]  Douglas A Luke,et al.  Getting the Big Picture in Community Science: Methods That Capture Context , 2005, American journal of community psychology.

[58]  Ron Sepic,et al.  The national biological information infrastructure as an E-government tool , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  N. Kapucu.  Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies , 2006 .

[60]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters , 2009 .

[61]  Alexandra Medina-Borja,et al.  Large-scale data envelopment analysis (DEA) implementation: a strategic performance management approach , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[62]  Mary Jae Paul,et al.  Interactive Disaster Communication on the Internet: A Content Analysis of Sixty-Four Disaster Relief Home Pages , 2001 .

[63]  J. Hick,et al.  Ethical issues in resource triage. , 2008, Respiratory care.

[64]  Diane Nelson Bryen,et al.  Cell phone use by adults with intellectual disabilities. , 2007, Intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[65]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Small Talk at Work: Potential Problems for Workers With an Intellectual Disability , 2003 .

[66]  K. Koenig,et al.  Improving surge capacity for biothreats: experience from Taiwan. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[67]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[68]  William F. Chappell,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF GOVERNMENT AID TO KATRINA SURVIVORS: EVIDENCE FROM SURVEY DATA* , 2007 .

[69]  Melinda Laituri,et al.  On Line Disaster Response Community: People as Sensors of High Magnitude Disasters Using Internet GIS , 2008, Sensors.

[70]  HerreraGerardo,et al.  Web accessibility for individuals with cognitive deficits , 2007 .

[71]  Mohan J. Dutta-Bergman.  Interpersonal communication after 9/11 via telephone and internet: A theory of channel complementarity , 2004, New Media Soc..

[72]  Chee-Wee Tan,et al.  Customer relationship management (CRM) in e-government: a relational perspective , 2006 .