Physician response to informed consent regulations for randomized clinical trials

To improve our understanding of physician reluctance to participate in randomized clinical trials, we examined physician responses to the regulation of obtaining written informed consent. Between June 1984 and February 1985 a purposive sample of 170 breast cancer specialists from eight countries completed a self‐administered questionnaire and follow‐up interview. The sample included 90 medical oncologists, 65 surgeons, and 29 radiotherapists. Responses to individual questions are presented in three global categories: (1) physician role—physicians believed that their view of their professional “self” was not compatible with informed consent regulations; (2) physician autonomy—physicians perceived a loss of individual decision‐making power and an increase in professional accountability; and (3) physician‐patient relationship—physicians stated that informed consent regulations influenced what they told trial patients and affected the ensuing doctor‐patient relationship. Respondents developed complex methods to accommodate the incongruities they perceived between their view of their professional self and the need to obtain informed consent.

[1]  S. Perry Technology assessment. Continuing uncertainty. , 1986 .

[2]  E. Pellegrino Editorial: Medical ethics, education, and the physician's image. , 1976, JAMA.

[3]  N. Mays,et al.  The randomised controlled trial in the evaluation of new technology: a case study. , 1986, British medical journal.

[4]  E. Laforet The fiction of informed consent. , 1976, JAMA.

[5]  N. Fost Consent as a Barrier to Research , 1979 .

[6]  R. Gillon Doctors and patients. , 1986, British medical journal.

[7]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Defining the role of the physician: medical education, tradition, and the legal process. , 1983, Specialty law digest. Health care.

[8]  H. Beecher,et al.  Consent in clinical experimentation: myth and reality. , 1966, JAMA.

[9]  J. Ensinck,et al.  ARE RESEARCH SUBJECTS REALLY INFORMED? , 1975, The Western journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Pocock,et al.  Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1984 .

[11]  C L Soskolne,et al.  Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Simpson Js Informed consent: a medical viewpoint. , 1981 .

[13]  M. Kraushar,et al.  Informed consent. Surrender or salvation? , 1986, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Mckinlay Who is really ignorant--physician or patient? , 1975, Journal of health and social behavior.

[15]  Lacher Mj Physicians and patients as obstacles to a randomized trial. , 1978 .

[16]  A. Capron Informed consent in catastrophic disease research and treatment. , 1974, University of Pennsylvania law review.

[17]  B. Gray Complexities of Informed Consent , 1978 .

[18]  L. Roth,et al.  What we do and do not know about informed consent. , 1981, JAMA.

[19]  W. Mackillop,et al.  Ethical problems in clinical research: the need for empirical studies of the clinical trials process. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[20]  M. S. Davis Predicting non-compliant behavior. , 1967, Journal of health and social behavior.

[21]  R. Alfidi Informed consent. A study of patient reaction. , 1971, JAMA.

[22]  "The compassionate physician": frequency and social determinants of physician-investigator concern for human subjects. , 1974, Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation.

[23]  R Gillon,et al.  "The patient's interests always come first"? Doctors and society. , 1986, British medical journal.

[24]  H. Dudley Informed consent in surgical trials. , 1984, British medical journal.

[25]  R. Blamey,et al.  RECRUITMENT TO BREAST CANCER TRIALS , 1984, The Lancet.