The second National Toxicology Program comparative exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results.

Chemical carcinogenicity has been the target of a large array of attempts to create alternative predictive models, ranging from short-term biological assays (e.g. mutagenicity tests) to theoretical models. Among the theoretical models, the application of the science of structure-activity relationships (SAR) has earned special prominence. A crucial element is the independent evaluation of the predictive ability. In the past decade, there have been two fundamental comparative exercises on the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity, held under the aegis to the US National Toxicology Program (NTP). In both exercises, the predictions were published before the animal data were known, thus using a most stringent criterion of predictivity. We analyzed the results of the first comparative exercise in a previous paper [Mutat. Res. 387 (1997) 35]; here, we present the complete results of the second exercise, and we analyze and compare the prediction sets. The range of accuracy values was quite large: the systems that performed best in this prediction exercise were in the range 60-65% accuracy. They included various human experts approaches (e.g. Oncologic) and biologically based approaches (e.g. the experimental transformation assay in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells). The main difficulty for the structure-activity relationship-based approaches was the discrimination between real carcinogens, and non-carcinogens containing structural alerts (SA) for genotoxic carcinogenicity. It is shown that the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship models, when possible, can contribute to overcome the above problem. Overall, given the uncertainty linked to the predictions, the predictions for the individual chemicals cannot be taken at face value; however, the general level of knowledge available today (especially for genotoxic carcinogens) allows qualified human experts to operate a very efficient priority setting of large sets of chemicals.

[1]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  Robust Classification for Imprecise Environments , 2000, Machine Learning.

[2]  Laura Passerini,et al.  QSARs for Individual Classes of Chemical Mutagens and Carcinogens , 2003 .

[3]  C. Ioannides,et al.  COMPACT and molecular structure in toxicity assessment: a prospective evaluation of 30 chemicals currently being tested for rodent carcinogenicity by the NCI/NTP. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  J. Huff,et al.  Chemicals and cancer in humans: first evidence in experimental animals. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  J Ashby,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results. , 1994, Mutagenesis.

[6]  R Benigni,et al.  Electrophilicity as measured by Ke: molecular determinants, relationship with other physical-chemical and quantum mechanical parameters, and ability to predict rodent carcinogenicity. , 1992, Carcinogenesis.

[7]  Vicki Dellarco,et al.  Use of mechanism-based structure-activity relationships analysis in carcinogenic potential ranking for drinking water disinfection by-products. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  R Benigni.  The first US National Toxicology Program exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results. , 1997, Mutation research.

[9]  R Benigni,et al.  Quantitative modeling and biology: the multivariate approach. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Soffritti,et al.  Mega‐experiments to Identify and Assess Diffuse Carcinogenic Risks , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  W. Lutz,et al.  Correlation of DNA adduct levels with tumor incidence: carcinogenic potency of DNA adducts. , 1999, Mutation research.

[12]  H. Rosenkranz,et al.  Carcinogenicity predictions for a group of 30 chemicals undergoing rodent cancer bioassays based on rules derived from subchronic organ toxicities. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  R C Garner,et al.  Analysis of DNA adducts by accelerator mass spectrometry in human breast tissue after administration of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine and benzo[a]pyrene. , 2000, Mutation research.

[14]  W. Lutz,et al.  In vivo covalent binding of organic chemicals to DNA as a quantitative indicator in the process of chemical carcinogenesis. , 1979, Mutation research.

[15]  C E Easterly,et al.  A RASH analysis of National Toxicology Program data: predictions for 30 compounds to be tested in rodent carcinogenesis experiments. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  W Kutschera,et al.  Comparative biotransformation studies of MeIQx and PhIP in animal models and humans. , 1999, Cancer letters.

[17]  K. Turteltaub,et al.  Tissue distribution and macromolecular binding of extremely low doses of [14C]-benzene in B6C3F1 mice. , 1997, Carcinogenesis.

[18]  R Benigni,et al.  QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals. , 1996, Mutation research.

[19]  J. Ashby.  Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or noncarcinogenicity. , 1985, Environmental mutagenesis.

[20]  Hiroyuki Hirano,et al.  Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of organic compounds from their chemical structures using the FALS method. , 1996 .

[21]  C. Hansch.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the unnamed science , 1993 .

[22]  Gaylor Dw,et al.  The ED01 study: summary and conclusions. , 1980 .

[23]  J. Bootman,et al.  Speculations on the rodent carcinogenicity of 30 chemicals currently under evaluation in rat and mouse bioassays organised by the U.S. National Toxicology Program , 1996, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[24]  S Parodi,et al.  Are genotoxic carcinogens more potent than nongenotoxic carcinogens? , 1991, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  R. Tennant,et al.  Stratification of rodent carcinogenicity bioassay results to reflect relative human hazard. , 1993, Mutation research.

[26]  E. J. Ariëns,et al.  Domestication of chemistry by design of safer chemicals: structure-activity relationships. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[27]  J Ashby,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 30 chemicals. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  Bette Hileman,et al.  Expert intuition tops in test of carcinogenicity prediction , 1993 .

[29]  B. Ames,et al.  Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  B Herbold,et al.  Evaluation of Mutagenicity Testing with Salmonella typhimurium TA102 in Three Different Laboratories , 1993 .

[31]  J. Huff,et al.  The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  J. Contrera,et al.  A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[33]  H. Rosenkranz,et al.  Prediction of the carcinogenicity of a second group of organic chemicals undergoing carcinogenicity testing. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Designing safer drugs: (Q)SAR-based identification of mutagens and carcinogens. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[35]  C A Marchant,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity using the DEREK system for 30 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program. The DEREK Collaborative Group. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[36]  J. Huff,et al.  Scientific concepts, value, and significance of chemical carcinogenesis studies. , 1991, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[37]  J. Ashby,et al.  The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures. , 1993, Mutation research.

[38]  R. King,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[39]  R. Isfort,et al.  Use of the Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for carcinogenicity prediction of chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program in rodent bioassays. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[40]  R. Tennant,et al.  Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program. , 1990, Mutagenesis.

[41]  J. Huff,et al.  Long‐Term Chemical Carcinogenesis Bioassays Predict Human Cancer Hazards: Issues, Controversies, and Uncertainties , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: from structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment. , 2002, Mutation research.

[43]  C. Hansch,et al.  Structure-activity relationships of chemical mutagens and carcinogens. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[44]  J. Huff,et al.  Absence of morphologic correlation between chemical toxicity and chemical carcinogenesis. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[45]  R Purdy,et al.  A mechanism-mediated model for carcinogenicity: model content and prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 25 organic chemicals. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[46]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of further 30 chemicals bioassayed by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. , 1996 .

[47]  Y T Woo,et al.  Development of structure-activity relationship rules for predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. , 1995, Toxicology letters.

[48]  L Zhang,et al.  The structure-activity relationship of skin carcinogenicity of aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocycles. , 1992, Chemico-biological interactions.

[49]  R Benigni,et al.  QSAR prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for a set of chemicals currently bioassayed by the US National Toxicology Program. , 1991, Mutagenesis.

[50]  Yin-tak Woo,et al.  Mechanism‐based structure‐activity relationship (SAR) analysis of carcinogenic potential of 30 NTP test chemicals∗ , 1997 .

[51]  R C Garner,et al.  The role of DNA adducts in chemical carcinogenesis. , 1998, Mutation research.

[52]  D. Bristol,et al.  The NIEHS Predictive-Toxicology Evaluation Project. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[53]  A.M. Richard,et al.  AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: Survey and status report , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[54]  J. Huff,et al.  Multicomponent criteria for predicting carcinogenicity: dataset of 30 NTP chemicals. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.