Hospital Financial Position and the Adoption of Electronic Health Records

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between financial position and adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in 2,442 acute care hospitals. The study was cross‐sectional and utilized a general linear mixed model with the multinomial distribution specification for data analysis. We verified the results by also running a multinomial logistic regression model. To measure our variables, we used data from (1) the 2007 American Hospital Association (AHA) electronic health record implementation survey, (2) the 2006 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Cost Reports, and (3) the 2006 AHA Annual Survey containing organizational and operational data. Our dependent variable was an ordinal variable with three levels used to indicate the extent of EHR adoption by hospitals. Our independent variables were five financial ratios: (1) net days revenue in accounts receivable, (2) total margin, (3) the equity multiplier, (4) total asset turnover, and (5) the ratio of total payroll to total expenses. For control variables, we used (1) bed size, (2) ownership type, (3) teaching affiliation, (4) system membership, (5) network participation, (6) full‐time equivalent nurses per adjusted average daily census, (7) average daily census per staffed bed, (8) Medicare patients percentage, (9) Medicaid patients percentage, (10) capitation‐based reimbursement, and (11) nonconcentrated market. Only liquidity was significant and positively associated with EHR adoption. Asset turnover ratio was significant but, unexpectedly, was negatively associated with EHR adoption. However, many control variables, most notably bed size, showed significant positive associations with EHR adoption. Thus, it seems that hospitals adopt EHRs as a strategic move to better align themselves with their environment.

[1]  Yasar A. Ozcan,et al.  Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Hospital EMR Adoption: A National Study , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.

[2]  G. O. Ginn.  Strategic change in hospitals: an examination of the response of the acute care hospital to the turbulent environment of the 1980s. , 1990, Health services research.

[3]  E. Cohen.  Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals , 2010 .

[4]  J. McCullough,et al.  The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals. , 2010, Health affairs.

[5]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Jim Goes,et al.  INTERORGANIZATIONAL LINKS AND INNOVATION: THE CASE OF HOSPITAL SERVICES , 1997 .

[8]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[10]  Thomas T H Wan,et al.  Factors Influencing Health Information System Adoption in American Hospitals , 2005, Health care management review.

[11]  R. Steinbrook.  Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Jill R Horwitz,et al.  U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[13]  David W. Bates,et al.  Position Paper: Factors and Forces Affecting EHR System Adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI Discussion , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  S. Shortell,et al.  Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system , 2001 .

[15]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  Hospital IT Adoption Strategies Associated with Implementation Success: Implications for Achieving Meaningful Use , 2010, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[16]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[17]  L. C. Gapenski.  Healthcare Finance: An Introduction to Accounting and Financial Management , 2001 .

[18]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Hospital Information Technology and Positive Financial Performance: A Different Approach to Finding an ROI , 2006, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[20]  P. Allison.  Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS® , 2005 .

[21]  Yan Hongqiao,et al.  Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records:Yes,There Is a Difference , 2007 .

[22]  W. Manning,et al.  The effects of group size and group economic factors on collaboration: a study of the financial performance of rural hospitals in consortia. , 1999, Health services research.

[23]  Gi-Won Go.  Strategic change in hospitals: an examination of the response of the acute care hospital to the turbulent environment of the 1980s. , 1990 .