The governance mechanism of the building material industry (BMI) in transformation to green BMI: The perspective of green building.

The transformation from the building material industry (BMI) to green BMI (GBMI) is not only of great significance to the upgrading of traditional BMI, but also has a pivotal role in promoting the sustainable development of cities. This paper studies the governance mechanism of the BMI in transformation to GBMI from the perspective of supply-side and demand-side of green building. First, evolutionary game theory is used to develop two three-party dynamic game models including building materials enterprises (BME), government, building developers (BD) and building consumers (BC). Second, numerical simulation experiment method is used to study the multi-stage governance mechanism based on the model deduction and the theoretical analysis of green transformation. The numerical simulation results show that the infrastructure construction projects on green building is an important governance mechanism for the rapid development of the GBMI, and the green innovation subsidy is a core governance mechanism for the high-quality development. The punishment of pollution and fraud compensation punishment and green innovation subsidy to green BME, tax incentives to green BD and purchase subsidy to green BC are conducive to promoting the change of the concept of green production and consumption. The aforementioned mechanisms and infrastructure construction contribute to promoting the production of green building materials in BME through developing and purchasing green buildings. The infrastructure construction and green innovation subsidy play a pivotal role in the high-quality development of the GBMI. This study not only reveals the theoretical mechanism of the BMI in transformation to GBMI under government-driven, but also provides a practical guidance for formulating high-quality development policies for GBMI. In addition, questionnaire method can be used to effectively solve the problem of bringing the four parties into a unified framework for future research.

[1]  Usha Mohan,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating sustainability in supply chains using evolutionary game theory , 2018, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Anyu Yu,et al.  Estimation of carbon efficiency decomposition in materials and potential material savings for China's construction industry , 2018, Resources Policy.

[3]  Henk Visscher,et al.  Modeling the green building (GB) investment decisions of developers and end-users with transaction costs (TCs) considerations , 2015 .

[4]  Yin Li,et al.  The economic development incentive mechanism for the existing energy-saving building structure in the perspective of game analysis , 2018, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies.

[5]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–2016 , 2018, Architectural Science Review.

[6]  R. Zhao,et al.  For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation , 2016 .

[7]  Alireza Arshadi Khamseh,et al.  An optimization model of three-player payoff based on fuzzy game theory in green supply chain , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Development of sustainability assessment tool for existing buildings , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[9]  Analysis on Green Building Materials Industry Chain's Evolutionary Game Based on Circular Economy , 2014 .

[10]  Baizhou Li,et al.  Transferring green building technologies from academic research institutes to building enterprises in the development of urban green building: A stochastic differential game approach , 2018 .

[11]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  What does it cost to convert a non-rated building into a green building? , 2018 .

[12]  I. Linkov,et al.  Defining resilience for the US building industry , 2019 .

[13]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  Modeling carbon regulation policies in inventory decisions of a multi-stage green supply chain: A game theory approach , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[14]  Xianguo Wu,et al.  Decision-making tools for evaluation the impact on the eco-footprint and eco-environmental quality of green building development policy , 2016 .

[15]  R. Merrill,et al.  Implementation of a multi-agent environmental regulation strategy under Chinese fiscal decentralization: An evolutionary game theoretical approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[16]  Demi Zhu,et al.  A game theory analysis of promoting the spongy city construction at the building and community scale , 2019, Habitat International.

[17]  C. Shuai,et al.  What are the root causes hindering the implementation of green roofs in urban China? , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Selecting sustainable waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste treatment: a game theory approach for group decision-making , 2016 .

[19]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  From feed-in tariff to renewable portfolio standards: An evolutionary game theory perspective , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of incentive mechanisms in P2P networks: a spatial evolutionary game theory perspective , 2015, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[21]  Reza Mahmoudi,et al.  Sustainable supply chains under government intervention with a real-world case study: An evolutionary game theoretic approach , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Baizhou Li,et al.  Matching management of supply and demand of green building technologies based on a novel matching method with intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[23]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Using cooperative game theory to determine profit distribution in IPD projects , 2019 .

[24]  Hongyi Li,et al.  Scenario forecast model of long term trends in rural labor transfer based on evolutionary games , 2015 .

[25]  Jiayuan Wang,et al.  Collaboration between designers and contractors to improve building energy performance , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[26]  R. Corsi,et al.  Ozone deposition velocities, reaction probabilities and product yields for green building materials , 2011 .

[27]  Moshe Schwartz,et al.  A game theory-based assessment of the implementation of green building in Israel , 2017 .

[28]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Life-cycle cost analysis of green-building implementation using timber applications , 2017 .

[29]  Yunlu Li,et al.  The Green Building Materials Enterprises in the Management of Innovation and Production Technology Improvement , 2013 .

[30]  Zhi-hua Hu,et al.  Using evolutionary game theory to study governments and manufacturers’ behavioral strategies under various carbon taxes and subsidies , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[31]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life‐Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single‐Family House , 2000 .

[32]  Minda Ma,et al.  Do commercial building sector-derived carbon emissions decouple from the economic growth in Tertiary Industry? A case study of four municipalities in China. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Development of building materials embodied greenhouse gases assessment criteria and system (BEGAS) in the newly revised Korea Green Building Certification System (G-SEED) , 2014 .

[34]  Higher standards for sustainable building materials , 2012 .

[35]  L. Li.  China's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0” , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[36]  Minda Ma,et al.  China Act on the Energy Efficiency of Civil Buildings (2008): A decade review. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Not fully charged: Welfare effects of tax incentives for employer-provided electric cars , 2016 .

[38]  S. Z. A. Gök,et al.  A Study on the Using of Game Theory in Sustainable Construction , 2017 .

[39]  Raheleh Rostami,et al.  Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method , 2018 .

[40]  Angelo Antoci,et al.  Environmental options and technological innovation: an evolutionary game model , 2009 .

[41]  Lukumon O. Oyedele,et al.  Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator , 2018 .

[42]  M. Skitmore,et al.  Green building incentives: A review , 2016 .

[43]  Yuchen Li,et al.  Analysis of intellectual property cooperation behavior and its simulation under two types of scenarios using evolutionary game theory , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[44]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A model of discrete zero-sum two-person matrix games with grey numbers to solve dispute resolution problems in construction , 2017 .

[45]  Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi,et al.  Greywater recycling in buildings using living walls and green roofs: A review of the applicability and challenges. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[46]  Yuan Zhou,et al.  How do low-carbon policies promote green diffusion among alliance-based firms in China? An evolutionary-game model of complex networks , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[47]  Rebecca J. Yang,et al.  Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects , 2016 .

[48]  S. Yin,et al.  A stochastic differential game of low carbon technology sharing in collaborative innovation system of superior enterprises and inferior enterprises under uncertain environment , 2018 .

[49]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  Affordable construction towards sustainable buildings: review on embodied energy in building materials , 2013 .