Scaling and Hierarchy in Urban Economies

In several recent publications, Bettencourt, West and collaborators claim that properties of cities such as gross economic production, personal income, numbers of patents filed, number of crimes committed, etc., show super-linear power-scaling with total population, while measures of resource use show sub-linear power-law scaling. Re-analysis of the gross economic production and personal income for cities in the United States, however, shows that the data cannot distinguish between power laws and other functional forms, including logarithmic growth, and that size predicts relatively little of the variation between cities. The striking appearance of scaling in previous work is largely artifact of using extensive quantities (city-wide totals) rather than intensive ones (per-capita rates). The remaining dependence of productivity on city size is explained by concentration of specialist service industries, with high value-added per worker, in larger cities, in accordance with the long-standing economic notion of the "hierarchy of central places".

[1]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[2]  Nils Lid Hjort,et al.  Model Selection and Model Averaging , 2001 .

[3]  H. Garretsen,et al.  Geography and development , 2011 .

[4]  S. Wood Stable and Efficient Multiple Smoothing Parameter Estimation for Generalized Additive Models , 2004 .

[5]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  A unified theory of urban living , 2010, Nature.

[6]  R. Berk Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique , 2003 .

[7]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[8]  Kevin T. Kelly Simplicity, Truth, and Probability , 2011 .

[9]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  David R. Hunter,et al.  mixtools: An R Package for Analyzing Mixture Models , 2009 .

[11]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 1999 .

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Linear Smoothers and Additive Models , 1989 .

[13]  S. Kullback,et al.  Information Theory and Statistics , 1959 .

[14]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  The devil rides again: Correlation as an index of fit. , 1973 .

[15]  Solomon Kullback,et al.  Information Theory and Statistics , 1970, The Mathematical Gazette.

[16]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[17]  D. Cox,et al.  Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference , 2006, math/0610846.

[18]  Stuart Barber,et al.  All of Statistics: a Concise Course in Statistical Inference , 2005 .

[19]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Weak inference with linear models. , 1977 .

[20]  M. Bornstein,et al.  The pace of life , 1976, Nature.

[21]  J. Simonoff Smoothing Methods in Statistics , 1998 .

[22]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Urban Scaling and Its Deviations: Revealing the Structure of Wealth, Innovation and Crime across Cities , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  Grace Wahba,et al.  Spline Models for Observational Data , 1990 .

[24]  P. Krugman The Self Organizing Economy , 1996 .

[25]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[26]  Wilbert C.M. Kallenberg,et al.  Data-Driven Smooth Tests When the Hypothesis is Composite , 1997 .