Cooperation in Health: Mapping Collaborative Networks on the Web

Objective To map and investigate the relationships established on the web between leading health-research institutions around the world. Methods Sample selection was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centres (CCs). Data on the 768 active CCs in 89 countries were retrieved from the WHO's database. The final sample consisted of 190 institutions devoted to health sciences in 42 countries. Data on each institution's website were retrieved using webometric techniques (interlinking), and an asymmetric matrix was generated for social network analysis. Findings The results showed that American and European institutions, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), are the most highly connected on the web and have a higher capacity to attract hyperlinks. The Karolinska Institute (KI-SE) in Sweden is well placed as an articulation point between several integrants of the network and the component's core but lacks general recognition on the web by hyperlinks. Regarding the north-south divide, Mexico and Brazil appear to be key southern players on the web. The results showed that the hyperlinks exchanged between northern and southern countries present an abysmal gap: 99.49% of the hyperlinks provided by the North are directed toward the North itself, in contrast to 0.51% that are directed toward the South. Regarding the South, its institutions are more connected to its northern partners, with 98.46% of its hyperlinks directed toward the North, and mainly toward the United States, compared with 1.54% toward southern neighbors. Conclusion It is advisable to strengthen integration policies on the web and to increase web networking through hyperlink exchange. In this way, the web could actually reflect international cooperation in health and help to legitimize and enhance the visibility of the many existing south-south collaboration networks.

[1]  Stephen Musgrave.  The community portal challenge--is there a technology barrier for local authorities? , 2004, Telematics Informatics.

[2]  M. Thelwall,et al.  U.S. academic departmental Web-site interlinking in the United States Disciplinary differences , 2003 .

[3]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A method for identifying clusters in sets of interlinking Web spaces , 2003, Scientometrics.

[4]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  Shaping the European research collaboration in the 6th Framework Programme health thematic area through network analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.

[5]  C. Morel,et al.  Enabling Policy Planning and Innovation Management through Patent Information and Co-Authorship Network Analyses: A Study of Tuberculosis in Brazil , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A modeling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns: the case of Canadian universities , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Isidro F. Aguillo,et al.  Factors affecting web links between European higher education institutions , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[8]  Daniela De Filippo,et al.  Descentralización de la actividad científica. El papel determinante de las regiones centrales: el caso de Madrid , 2009 .

[9]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality , 1980 .

[10]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  Network structure and minimum degree , 1983 .

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university Web site interlinking , 2002, J. Documentation.

[12]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Disciplinary and linguistic considerations for academic Web linking: An exploratory hyperlink mediated study with Mainland China and Taiwan , 2003, Scientometrics.

[13]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Web-science communication in the age of globalization , 2006, New Media Soc..

[15]  W. Patrick.  The Asia Pacific Academic Consortium for Global Public Health and Medicine: Stabilizing South-South Academic Collaboration , 2011, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.

[16]  Liwen Vaughan,et al.  Comparing business competition positions based on Web co-link data: The global market vs. the Chinese market , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Local government web sites in Finland: A geographic and webometric analysis , 2009, Scientometrics.

[18]  Mike McConnell,et al.  Presenting a model for the structure and content of a university World Wide Web site , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Interlinking between Asia-Pacific University Web sites , 2002, Scientometrics.

[20]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  Análisis estructural de la web académica iberoamericana , 2009 .

[21]  J L Andersson,et al.  Social Network Size Affects Neural Circuits in Macaques , 2011, Science.

[22]  Debora Shaw.  Playing the Links: Interactivity and Stickiness in .Com and "Not.Com" Web Sites , 2001, First Monday.

[23]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A study of the interlinking between Asia-Pacific University Web sites , 2002 .

[25]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to 'webometrics' , 1997, J. Documentation.