Enhanced algorithms to ensure the success of rendezvous maneuvers using aerodynamic forces

A common practice in the field of differential lift and drag controlled satellite formation flight is to analytically design maneuver trajectories using linearized relative motion models and the constant density assumption. However, the state-of-the-art algorithms inevitably fail if the initial condition of the final control phase exceeds an orbit and spacecraft-dependent range, the so-called feasibility range. This article presents enhanced maneuver algorithms for the third (and final) control phase which ensure the overall maneuver success independent of the initial conditions. Thereby, all maneuvers which have previously been categorized as infeasible due to algorithm limitations are rendered feasible. An individual algorithm is presented for both possible control options of the final phase, namely differential lift or drag. In addition, a methodology to precisely determine the feasibility range without the need of computational expensive Monte Carlo simulations is presented. This allows fast and precise assessments of possible influences of boundary conditions, such as the orbital inclination or the maneuver altitude, on the feasibility range.

[1]  M. Horsley,et al.  Small Satellite Rendezvous Using Differential Lift and Drag , 2013 .

[2]  Matthew Garratt,et al.  Investigation into the Practicability of Differential Lift-Based Spacecraft Rendezvous , 2017 .

[3]  Riccardo Bevilacqua,et al.  Rendezvous Maneuvers of Multiple Spacecraft Using Differential Drag Under J2 Perturbation , 2008 .

[4]  W. H. Clohessy,et al.  Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous , 2012 .

[5]  Ran Sun,et al.  Satellite rendezvous using differential aerodynamic forces under J2 perturbation , 2015 .

[6]  C. Traub,et al.  Improved success rates of rendezvous maneuvers using aerodynamic forces , 2020 .

[7]  Leon Stepan,et al.  Constellation Phasing with Differential Drag on Planet Labs Satellites , 2017 .

[8]  Carolina Lee Leonard,et al.  Formationkeeping of spacecraft via differential drag , 1991 .

[9]  Walter Frese,et al.  Orbit deployment and drag control strategy for formation flight while minimizing collision probability and drift , 2020, CEAS Space Journal.

[10]  M. Sureda,et al.  The benefits of very low earth orbit for earth observation missions , 2020, Progress in Aerospace Sciences.

[11]  T. Binder,et al.  On the exploitation of differential aerodynamic lift and drag as a means to control satellite formation flight , 2020, CEAS Space Journal.

[12]  R. Sedwick,et al.  High-Fidelity Linearized J Model for Satellite Formation Flight , 2002 .

[13]  E. Bergmann,et al.  Orbital Formationkeeping with Differential Drag , 1987 .

[14]  David Hinkley,et al.  Operations, Orbit Determination, and Formation Control of the AeroCube-4 CubeSats , 2013 .