Mandate Versus Championship: Vertical government intervention and diffusion of innovation in public services in authoritarian China

This research focuses on innovation and its diffusion in public services in authoritarian China. A mechanism between vertical government intervention and diffusion of innovation in public services is established by conducting a comparative case study between Sichuan and Tianjin. Administrative commands facilitate the formation of the ‘mandatory policy diffusion’ that rapidly diffuses policy instruments. Competition in the performance evaluation-based personnel system contributes to the formation of ‘championship policy diffusion’, which leads to the divergence of policy instruments in neighbouring local governments. Therefore, classic theoretical hypotheses on geographical proximity, competition, and vertical intervention concerning innovation diffusion need to be modified.

[1]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Zachary Elkins,et al.  The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[3]  David Collier,et al.  Prerequisites Versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners , 2012 .

[5]  K. Füglister,et al.  Where does learning take place? The role of intergovernmental cooperation in policy diffusion , 2012 .

[6]  Robert Schwager,et al.  On the Incentives to Experiment in Federations , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  William D. Berry,et al.  Understanding United States Government Growth: An Empirical Analysis of the Postwar Era , 1987 .

[8]  P. Nedergaard Policy Learning Processes in International Committees , 2009 .

[9]  Xueguang Zhou Partial Reform and the Chinese Bureaucracy in the Post-Mao Era , 1995 .

[10]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Policy Transfer in European Union Governance: Regulating the Utilities , 2007 .

[11]  Helen Ingram,et al.  Why policies succeed or fail , 1980 .

[12]  S. Welch,et al.  The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation , 1980 .

[13]  A. Oakley Public policy experimentation: Lessons from America , 1998 .

[14]  P. May Policy Learning and Failure , 1992, Journal of Public Policy.

[15]  Koleman S. Strumpf,et al.  Does Government Decentralization Increase Policy Innovation? , 1999 .

[16]  S. Rose-Ackerman Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote Innovation? , 1980, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[17]  Xun Cao GLOBAL NETWORKS AND DOMESTIC POLICY CONVERGENCE A NETWORK EXPLANATION OF POLICY CHANGES , 2012 .

[18]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[19]  William D. Berry,et al.  Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[20]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Measuring Innovation - Applying the Literature-Based Innovation Output Indicator to Public Services , 2002 .

[21]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[22]  Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000 , 2004, International Organization.

[23]  Jae Ho Chung,et al.  Studies of Central–Provincial Relations in the People's Republic of China: A Mid-Term Appraisal , 1995, The China Quarterly.

[24]  P. Peterson,et al.  Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard , 1990 .

[25]  C. Greve,et al.  Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review , 2007 .

[26]  S. Heilmann,et al.  Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise , 2008 .

[27]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion , 2004 .

[28]  Alan Richards,et al.  Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy Making , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[29]  K. Foster Improving Municipal Governance in China , 2006 .

[30]  R. Rose Learning From Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[31]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature , 1996 .

[32]  J. Kung,et al.  The Tragedy of the Nomenklatura: Career Incentives and Political Radicalism during China's Great Leap Famine , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[33]  Frances S. Berry Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[34]  G. Hoberg Sleeping with an Elephant: The American Influence on Canadian Environmental Regulation , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[35]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[36]  Gordon Liu,et al.  The Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance: a landmark reform towards universal coverage in China. , 2009, Health economics.

[37]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[38]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  The Role of Agenda Setting in Policy Innovation , 1997 .

[39]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[40]  S. Heilmann,et al.  Mao's invisible hand : the political foundations of adaptive governance in China , 2011 .

[41]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Exploring The Diffusion Of Innovation Among High And Low Innovative Localities , 2011 .

[42]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China , 1995, World Politics.

[43]  H. Cai,et al.  Did Government Decentralization Cause China's Economic Miracle? , 2006 .

[44]  C. Radaelli Measuring policy learning: regulatory impact assessment in Europe , 2009 .

[45]  Shaoguang Wang Adapting by Learning: The Evolution of China's Rural Health Care Financing , 2009 .

[46]  D. Béland,et al.  A Long Financial March: Pension Reform in China , 2004, Journal of Social Policy.

[47]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Can State Government Actions Affect Innovation and Its Diffusion?: An Extended Communication Model and Empirical Test , 1997 .

[48]  Jie Gao Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China , 2009 .

[49]  Jack L. Walker Comment: Problems in Research on the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[50]  S. Osborne Voluntary Organizations and Innovation in Public Services , 1998 .

[51]  Richard S. Hillman,et al.  Bureaucracy and innovation , 1970 .

[52]  E. Maskin,et al.  Incentives, Scale Economies and Organizational Form , 1997 .

[53]  Yijia Jing Outsourcing in China: an exploratory assessment , 2008 .

[54]  L. Xue,et al.  Domestic reform and global integration: public administration reform in China over the last 30 years , 2012 .

[55]  J. Mikesell Election periods and state tax policy cycles , 1978 .

[56]  Bill K. P. Chou Does “Good Governance” Matter? Civil Service Reform in China , 2007 .

[57]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form , 2000 .

[58]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[59]  Hon S. Chan,et al.  Performance Measurement in Chinese Local Governments: Guest Editors' Introduction , 2008 .

[60]  Fabrizio Gilardi,et al.  Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes , 2010 .

[61]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  Europeanization, Policy Learning, and New Modes of Governance , 2008, Regional Comparisons in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies.

[62]  Virginia H. Gray Expenditures and Innovation as Dimensions of "Progressivism": A Note on the American States , 1974 .

[63]  S. Heilmann,et al.  From Local Experiments to National Policy: The Origins of China's Distinctive Policy Process , 2008, The China Journal.

[64]  Kinglun Ngok,et al.  Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: a zigzag road to a promising future , 2007 .

[65]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[66]  S. Whiting,et al.  Power and Wealth in Rural China: The Political Economy of Institutional Change , 2000 .

[67]  Jean C. Oi Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China , 1992, World Politics.

[68]  Janice L. Caulfield,et al.  Local government reform in China: a rational actor perspective , 2006 .

[69]  P. Lewis New State Ice Co. V. Liebmann , 2016 .

[70]  P. Hall Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[71]  L. Sigelman,et al.  Social service innovation in the American states: deinstitutionalization of the mentally retarded. , 1982, Social science quarterly.

[72]  William D. Berry,et al.  Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity , 1992 .

[73]  David C. Nice,et al.  Policy innovation in state government , 1993 .

[74]  William D. Berry,et al.  A Strategic Theory of Policy Diffusion via Intergovernmental Competition , 2011 .

[75]  Shih-Jiunn Shi,et al.  Left to Market and Family – Again? Ideas and the Development of the Rural Pension Policy in China , 2006 .

[76]  K. Tsui Local tax system, intergovernmental transfers and China's local fiscal disparities , 2005 .

[77]  The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China , 1996 .

[78]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[79]  J. Foster Regionalism and Innovation in the American States , 1978, The Journal of Politics.

[80]  Dali L. Yang Economic Transformation and its Political Discontents in China: Authoritarianism, Unequal Growth, and the Dilemmas of Political Development , 2006 .

[81]  S. Nutley,et al.  Policy transfer and convergence within the UK: the case of local government performance improvement regimes , 2012 .

[82]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[83]  C. Radaelli Policy Transfer in The European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy. JMWP No. 10.97, September 1997 , 1997 .

[84]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China , 2005 .

[85]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Future Prospects for Performance Management in Chinese City Governments , 2010 .

[86]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Congressional Appropriations and the Electoral Connection , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[87]  D. Braun,et al.  Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously , 2006 .

[88]  Yuanli Liu,et al.  Reforming China's urban health insurance system. , 2002, Health policy.

[89]  A. Karch Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States , 2007 .

[90]  M. Howlett,et al.  Patterns of Policy Instrument Choice: Policy Styles, Policy Learning and the Privatization Experience , 1993 .