The contribution of geophysical techniques to site characterisation and liquefaction risk assessment: Case study of Nafplion City, Greece

Abstract We present an example of how geophysical methodologies can considerably contribute to seismic and liquefaction risk assessment in an area where urban development is planned. The inspection for possible hidden faults by geophysical methods is particularly critical, since such a possibility could practically hinder the town planning in this area. However, even if no primary threats exist within the area, the response of the foundation soil to various scenarios of historical earthquakes, which have affected the place in the past, must be examined. The geophysical methodologies could also assist this analysis, contributing with the calculation of the amplification of the seismic motion from the bedrock up to the surface. The investigation area of Nafplion, Greece, was suspected to have high liquefaction potential since the foundation soil consists of loose sandy silt with a very shallow aquifer. The implementation of gravity and seismic methods considerably aided the investigation for possible seismic faults. Special emphasis was given to seismic depth migration and particularly to the construction of valid velocity models, in order to precisely calculate the dip characteristics of the structures. Shallow seismic techniques were also applied to provide the near-surface velocity structure, which is a prerequisite for assessing the liquefaction risk. In particular, our case study provides an example of how seismic methods (seismic reflection, seismic refraction, seismic modelling, MASW, multichannel analysis of microtremors and crosshole investigations) when combined with geotechnical borehole testing, enhance the reliability of their output and allow the coverage of wide areas in a cost-effective way in comparison to standard borehole tests. Data and information provided by the application of the geophysical methods were subsequently incorporated in the liquefaction risk assessment at several selected sites within the study area. Factors of safety against liquefaction and liquefaction potential values were computed for three scenario earthquakes that were selected on the basis of the known seismic impact of past earthquakes in the town of Nafplion. We found that liquefaction probability can reach values as high as 80% at some sites depending on the selected earthquake scenario. The formations most prone to liquefaction are detected at depths between 5 and 10 m. This information can be helpful for making risk-based design decision in this region.

[1]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Determination of S-wave velocity structure using microtremors and spac method applied in Thessaloniki (Greece) , 2004 .

[2]  Lee M. Liberty,et al.  Imaging complex structure in shallow seismic-reflection data using prestack depth migration , 2006 .

[3]  J. Jackson,et al.  Seismicity and associated strain of central Greece between 1890 and 1988 , 1990 .

[4]  R. Andrus,et al.  LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE BASED ON SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY , 1997 .

[5]  B. Wernicke.  Low-angle normal faults and seismicity: A review , 1995 .

[6]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  The 26 January 2001 M 7.6 Bhuj, India, Earthquake: Observed and Predicted Ground Motions , 2002 .

[7]  R. Castro,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of the 30 September 1999 Mw 7.5 Earthquake, Oaxaca, Mexico , 2005 .

[8]  M. Asten,et al.  Estimating the Shear Velocity Profile of Quaternary Silts Using Microtremor Array (SPAC) Measurements , 2005 .

[9]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Modeling finite-fault radiation from the ωn spectrum , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  E. M. Anderson.  The dynamics of faulting , 1905, Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society.

[11]  David M. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[12]  K. Pitilakis,et al.  Liquefaction case histories and empirical relations of earthquake magnitude versus distance from the broader Aegean region , 2005 .

[13]  C. DAVISON,et al.  The Earthquakes in Greece , 1894, Nature.

[14]  L. L. Nettleton.  Determination of density for reduction of gravimeter observations , 1939 .

[15]  Evaluation Of Soil Improvement Via Blasting Using Array-Based Surface Wave Tests , 2007 .

[16]  T. Takahashi,et al.  High resolution seismic refraction method using surface and borehole data for site characterization of rocks , 2001 .

[17]  Robert E. Abbott,et al.  Geophysical confirmation of low-angle normal slip on the historically active Dixie Valley fault, Nevada , 2001 .

[18]  Timothy H. Larson,et al.  Integration of P- and SH-wave high-resolution seismic reflection and micro-gravity techniques to improve interpretation of shallow subsurface structure: New Madrid seismic zone , 2006 .

[19]  Richard D. Miller,et al.  Multichannel analysis of surface waves , 1999 .

[20]  James A. Hunter,et al.  Application of high-resolution seismic techniques in the evaluation of earthquake site response, Ottawa Valley, Canada , 2003 .

[21]  Michael W. Asten,et al.  Resolving a velocity inversion at the geotechnical scale using the microtremor (passive seismic) survey method , 2004 .

[22]  Zafeiria Roumelioti,et al.  Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Application to Rock and Soil Sites with Implications for Nonlinear Site Response , 2003 .

[23]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Probabilistic Framework for Liquefaction Potential by Shear Wave Velocity , 2001 .

[24]  Robert B. Smith,et al.  Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure , 1992 .

[25]  L. Improta,et al.  Combining seismic reflection with multifold wide‐aperture profiling: An effective strategy for high‐resolution shallow imaging of active faults , 2007 .

[26]  Gerassimos A. Papadopoulos,et al.  Magnitude-distance relations for liquefaction in soil from earthquakes , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  P. Hancock,et al.  Continental Extensional Tectonics , 1987 .

[28]  G. Atkinson,et al.  FINSIM--a FORTRAN Program for Simulating Stochastic Acceleration Time Histories from Finite Faults , 1998 .

[29]  K. Stokoe,et al.  Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity , 2000 .

[30]  T L Youd,et al.  LIQUEFACTION CRITERIA BASED ON STATISTICAL AND PROBABILISTIC ANALYSES , 1997 .

[31]  R. Holdsworth,et al.  Geological Society Special Publications , 2005 .

[32]  B. N. Margaris,et al.  HEAD 1.0: A Unified HEllenic Accelerogram Database , 2004 .

[33]  T. G. Sitharam,et al.  Site classification and estimation of surface level seismic hazard using geophysical data and probabilistic approach , 2009 .

[34]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[35]  O. Yilmaz,et al.  A Case Study For Seismic Zonation In Municipal Areas , 2005 .

[36]  J. Stockwell,et al.  The CWP/SU: Seismic Un ∗ x package , 1999 .

[37]  James Jackson,et al.  Active normal faulting and crustal extension , 1987, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[38]  Hiroshi Okada,et al.  Theory of Efficient Array Observations of Microtremors with Special Reference to the SPAC Method , 2006 .