Cognitive Workload Analysis of Fighter Aircraft Pilots in Flight Simulator Environment

Maintaining and balancing an optimal level of workload is essential for completing the task productively. Fighter aircraft is one such example, where the pilot is loaded heavily both physically (due to G manoeuvering) and cognitively (handling multiple sensors, perceiving, processing and multi-tasking including communications and handling weapons) to fulfill the combat mission requirements. This cognitive demand needs to be analysed to understand the workload of fighter pilot. Objective of this study is to analyse dynamic workload of fighter pilots in a realistic high-fidelity flight simulator environment during different flying workload conditions. The various workload conditions are (a) normal visibility, (b) low visibility, (c) normal visibility with secondary task, and (d) low visibility with secondary task. Though, pilot’s flying performance score was good, the physiological measure like heart rate variability (HRV) features and subjective assessment (NASA-TLX) components are found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) between tasks. HRV features such as SD2, SDNN, VLF and total power are found to be significant at all task load conditions. The features LFnu and HFnu are able to differentiate the effect of low visibility and secondary cognitive task, which was imposed as increased task in this study. This result benefits to understand the pilot’s task and performance at each flying phase and their cognitive demands during dynamic workload using HRV, which could assist pilot’s training schedule in optimal way on simulators as well as in actual flight conditions.

[1]  Susana Rubio,et al.  Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and Workload Profile Methods , 2004 .

[2]  Chen Liu,et al.  A model for discrimination and prediction of mental workload of aircraft cockpit display interface , 2014 .

[3]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  An Analysis of Mental Workload in Pilots During Flight Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures , 2002 .

[4]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Cognitive Behavior Evaluation Based on Physiological Parameters among Young Healthy Subjects with Yoga as Intervention , 2015, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[5]  F. Shaffer,et al.  An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms , 2017, Front. Public Health.

[6]  V. C. Padaki,et al.  Smart Vest: wearable multi-parameter remote physiological monitoring system. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Tomi Laitinen,et al.  Heart rate and performance during combat missions in a flight simulator. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  A Comparison of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Indices in Distinguishing Single-Task Driving and Driving Under Secondary Cognitive Workload , 2017 .

[9]  Night,et al.  Mental Work Load Assessment during different Simulated Instrument Meteorological Conditions , in Clouds and During Dark , 2014 .

[10]  S. Poonguzhali,et al.  Assessment of Human Fatigue during Physical Performance using Physiological Signals: A Review , 2017 .

[11]  G. Borghini,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 2022 .

[12]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[13]  P G Jorna,et al.  Heart rate and workload variations in actual and simulated flight. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[14]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[15]  D A Wiegmann,et al.  Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification system (HFACS). , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  Jim Nixon,et al.  Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Heikki Mansikka,et al.  Fighter pilots' heart rate, heart rate variation and performance during an instrument flight rules proficiency test. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.