Elaboration of a semi-automated algorithm for brain arteriovenous malformation segmentation: initial results

ObjectivesThe purpose of our study was to distinguish the different components of a brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) on 3D rotational angiography (3D-RA) using a semi-automated segmentation algorithm.Materials and methodsData from 3D-RA of 15 patients (8 males, 7 females; 14 supratentorial bAVMs, 1 infratentorial) were used to test the algorithm. Segmentation was performed in two steps: (1) nidus segmentation from propagation (vertical then horizontal) of tagging on the reference slice (i.e., the slice on which the nidus had the biggest surface); (2) contiguity propagation (based on density and variance) from tagging of arteries and veins distant from the nidus. Segmentation quality was evaluated by comparison with six frame/s DSA by two independent reviewers. Analysis of supraselective microcatheterisation was performed to dispel discrepancy.ResultsMean duration for bAVM segmentation was 64 ± 26 min. Quality of segmentation was evaluated as good or fair in 93 % of cases. Segmentation had better results than six frame/s DSA for the depiction of a focal ectasia on the main draining vein and for the evaluation of the venous drainage pattern.ConclusionThis segmentation algorithm is a promising tool that may help improve the understanding of bAVM angio-architecture, especially the venous drainage.Key points• The segmentation algorithm allows for the distinction of the AVM’s components• This algorithm helps to see the venous drainage of bAVMs more precisely• This algorithm may help to reduce the treatment-related complication rate

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  R F Spetzler,et al.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  T. Ishigaki,et al.  Magnitude subtraction vs. complex subtraction in dynamic contrast‐enhanced 3D‐MR angiography: Basic experiments and clinical evaluation , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  L R Schad,et al.  Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Francis K. H. Quek,et al.  A review of vessel extraction techniques and algorithms , 2004, CSUR.

[6]  C. Manelfe,et al.  Angiographic architecture of intracranial vascular malformations and fistulas — pretherapeutic aspects , 2005, Neurosurgical Review.

[7]  K. Cleary,et al.  Image-Guided Procedures : A Review , 2006 .

[8]  L. Pierot,et al.  Pial Arteriovenous Malformations , 2008 .

[9]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Double‐reference cross‐correlation algorithm for separation of the arteries and veins from 3D MRA time series , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  O Levrier,et al.  Three-dimensional rotational angiography in the assessment of the angioarchitecture of brain arteriovenous malformations. , 2011, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[11]  Ewout Vansteenkiste,et al.  Segmentation of brain blood vessels using projections in 3-D CT angiography images , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Nils Daniel Forkert,et al.  Computer-aided nidus segmentation and angiographic characterization of arteriovenous malformations , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.