A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach

A best practices guide for the use of airborne laser scanning data (ALS; also referred to as Light Detection and Ranging or LiDAR) in forest inventory applications is now available for download from the Canadian Forest Service bookstore (White et al ., 2013; http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id= 34887 ). The guide, produced by the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, brings together state-of-the-art approaches, methods, and data to enable readers interested in using ALS data to characterize large forest areas in a costeffective manner. The best practices presented in the guide are based on more than 25 years of scientific research on the application of ALS data to forest inventory. The guide describes the entire process for generating forest inventory attributes from ALS data and recommends best practices for each step of the process—from ground sampling through to metric generation and model development. The collection of ground plot data for model calibration and validation is a crit ical component of the recommended approach and is described in detail in the guide. Appendices to the guide pro vide additional details on ALS data acquisition and metric generation. The area-based approach is typically accomplished in two steps (Fig. 1). In the first step, ALS data are acquired for the entire area of interest (wall-to-wall coverage), tree-level meas ures are acquired from sampled ground plots and summa rized to the plot level, and predictive models are developed (e.g., using regression or non-parametric methods). For the purposes of model development, the ALS data is clipped to correspond to the area and shape of each ground plot. A set of descriptive statistics (referred to as “metrics”) are calculated from the clipped ALS data and include measures such as mean height, height percentiles, and canopy cover (Woods et al . 2011). Inventory attributes of interest are either measured by ground crews (i.e., height, diameter) or modelled (i.e., vol ume, biomass) for each ground plot. It is critical that ground plots represent the full range of variability in the attribute(s) of interest and to accomplish this, the use of a stratified sampling approach is recommended, preferably with strata that are defined using the ALS metrics themselves. Thus, the ALS data must be acquired and processed prior to ground sampling. Finally, predictive models are constructed using the ground plot attributes as the response variable and the ALS-derived metrics as predictors. In the second step of the area-based approach, models that were developed using co-located ground plots and ALS data are then applied to the entire area of interest to generate the desired wall-to-wall estimates and maps of specific forest inventory attributes. The same metrics that are calculated for the clipped ALS data (as described above) are generated for the wall-to-wall ALS data and the predictive equations devel oped from the modelling in the first step are applied to the entire area of interest using the wall-to-wall metrics. The pre diction unit for this application is a grid cell, the size of which relates to the size of the ground-measured plot. Once the pre dictive equations are applied to the wall-to-wall ALS data, each grid cell will have an estimate for the attribute of interest. The primary advantage of the area-based approach is hav ing complete (i.e., wall-to-wall) spatially explicit measures of canopy height, associated metrics, and all modelled attributes for an area of interest (Fig. 2). The area-based approach described in the guide also enables more precise estimates of certain forest variables and the calculation of confidence intervals for stand-level estimates (Woods et al . 2011).

[1]  F. J. Richards A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[2]  T. Honer THE USE OF HEIGHT AND SQUARED DIAMETER RATIOS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MERCHANTABLE CUBIC FOOT VOLUME , 1964 .

[3]  J. P. Demaerschalk,et al.  Suggestions and Criteria for More Effective Regression Sampling. 2. , 1974 .

[4]  R. Cook Influential Observations in Linear Regression , 1979 .

[5]  N. Guttman On the Sensitivity of Sample L Moments to Sample Size , 1994 .

[6]  David Pothier,et al.  Comparison of relative accuracy and time requirement between the caliper, the diameter tape and an electronic tree measuring fork , 1995 .

[7]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[8]  P. Bolstad,et al.  Forest canopy, terrain, and distance effects on global positioning system point accuracy , 1996 .

[9]  M. Ter-Mikaelian,et al.  Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species , 1997 .

[10]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters , 1998 .

[11]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[12]  E. Næsset Point accuracy of combined pseudorange and carrier phase differential GPS under forest canopy , 1999 .

[13]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[14]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[15]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[16]  W. Zakrzewski A Mathematically Tractable Stem Profile Model for Jack Pine in Ontario , 1999 .

[17]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[18]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests , 2001 .

[19]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 2001 .

[20]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[21]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[22]  J. Brian Gray,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[23]  Ralph Dubayah,et al.  Validation of Vegetation Canopy Lidar sub-canopy topography measurements for a dense tropical forest , 2002 .

[24]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[25]  E. Naesset,et al.  Assessing Point Accuracy of DGPS Under Forest Canopy Before Data Acquisition, in the Field and After Postprocessing , 2002 .

[26]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[27]  K. Lim,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests , 2003 .

[28]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[29]  David J. Harding,et al.  High-resolution lidar topography of the Puget Lowland, Washington - A bonanza for earth science , 2003 .

[30]  S. Ustin,et al.  Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling , 2003 .

[31]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Calibrating view angle and lens distortion of the Nikon fish-eye converter FC-E8 , 2004, Journal of Forest Research.

[32]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[33]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[34]  C. C. Barton,et al.  Where in the world are my field plots? Using GPS effectively in environmental field studies , 2004 .

[35]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Measuring biomass and carbon in delaware using an airborne profiling LIDAR , 2004 .

[36]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[37]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[38]  Robert C. Parker,et al.  An Application of LiDAR in a Double-Sample Forest Inventory , 2004 .

[39]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic detection of harvested trees and determination of forest growth using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[40]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  ASSESSING THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF AIRBORNE AND GROUND-BASED LIDAR DATA FOR RED PINE AND MIXED DECIDUOUS FOREST PLOTS , 2004 .

[41]  J. Holmgren Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[42]  Mark R. Segal,et al.  Machine Learning Benchmarks and Random Forest Regression , 2004 .

[43]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing regression methods in estimation of biophysical properties of forest stands from two different inventories using laser scanner data , 2005 .

[44]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  A Comparison of Autonomous, WAAS, Real-Time, and Post-Processed Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Accuracies in Northern Forests , 2005 .

[45]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[46]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[47]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Estimating forest canopy fuel parameters using LIDAR data , 2005 .

[48]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Light detection and ranging (LIDAR): an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. , 2005 .

[49]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data , 2005 .

[50]  F. Raulier,et al.  Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations , 2005 .

[51]  W. Cohen,et al.  Patterns of covariance between forest stand and canopy structure in the Pacific Northwest , 2005 .

[52]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[53]  P. Gessler,et al.  Regression modeling and mapping of coniferous forest basal area and tree density from discrete-return lidar and multispectral satellite data , 2006 .

[54]  Standard and Real-Time Accuracy and Reliability of a Mapping-Grade GPS in a Coniferous Western Oregon Forest , 2006 .

[55]  Scott D. Roberts,et al.  LiDAR A new tool for forest measurements , 2006 .

[56]  Mahadev Sharma,et al.  Height–diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach , 2007 .

[57]  M. Maltamo,et al.  The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2007 .

[58]  Michael G. Wing,et al.  Performance Comparison of a Low-Cost Mapping Grade Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Receiver and Consumer Grade GPS Receiver under Dense Forest Canopy , 2007, Journal of Forestry.

[59]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[60]  H. Andersen,et al.  A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Estimating Forest Biomass from Light Detection and Ranging Data , 2008 .

[61]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .

[62]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management , 2008 .

[63]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2008 .

[64]  Michael G. Wing,et al.  Consumer-Grade Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Receiver Performance , 2008 .

[65]  X. Guo,et al.  Canadian national biomass equations: new parameter estimates that include British Columbia data , 2008 .

[66]  K. Lim,et al.  LiDAR and Weibull modeling of diameter and basal area , 2008 .

[67]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  A Guide to LIDAR Data Acquisition and Processing for the Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 2008 .

[68]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .

[69]  Michael G. Wing,et al.  Horizontal Measurement Performance of Five Mapping-Grade Global Positioning System Receiver Configurations in Several Forested Settings , 2008 .

[70]  K. Lim,et al.  Predicting forest stand variables from LiDAR data in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence forest of Ontario , 2008 .

[71]  S. Popescu,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass : A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers , 2009 .

[72]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[73]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR‐optimized sampling design , 2009 .

[74]  E. Næsset,et al.  Assessing effects of positioning errors and sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data. , 2009 .

[75]  Alistair M. S. Smith,et al.  Discrete Return Lidar in Natural Resources: Recommendations for Project Planning, Data Processing, and Deliverables , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[76]  Richard K. Broughton,et al.  Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: A case study in lowland Britain , 2009 .

[77]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Assessing general relationships between aboveground biomass and vegetation structure parameters for improved carbon estimate from lidar remote sensing , 2009 .

[78]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: A case study with Norway spruce , 2010 .

[79]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests , 2010 .

[80]  S. Magnussen,et al.  A model-assisted k-nearest neighbour approach to remove extrapolation bias , 2010 .

[81]  Vicente S. Monleon,et al.  Challenges to Estimating Tree Height via LiDAR in Closed-Canopy Forests: A Parable from Western Oregon , 2010, Forest Science.

[82]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest , 2010 .

[83]  T. Gobakken,et al.  Light detection and ranging-based measures of mixed hardwood forest structure. , 2010 .

[84]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Effects of different sensors and leaf-on and leaf-off canopy conditions on echo distributions and individual tree properties derived from airborne laser scanning , 2010 .

[85]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Stability of Sample-Based Scanning-LiDAR-Derived Vegetation Metrics for Forest Monitoring , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[86]  Part 7 , 2011 .

[87]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Model-assisted regional forest biomass estimation using LiDAR and InSAR as auxiliary data: A case study from a boreal forest area , 2011 .

[88]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Classification with correlated features: unreliability of feature ranking and solutions , 2011, Bioinform..

[89]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass , 2011 .

[90]  K. Lim,et al.  Operational implementation of a LiDAR inventory in Boreal Ontario , 2011 .

[91]  So you want to use LiDAR? A guide on how to use LiDAR in forestry , 2011 .

[92]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Estimating above-ground biomass in young forests with airborne laser scanning , 2011 .

[93]  Riyad Ismail,et al.  Optimizing spectral resolutions for the classification of C 3 and C 4 grass species, using wavelengths of known absorption features , 2012 .

[94]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Combination of individual tree detection and area-based approach in imputation of forest variables using airborne laser data , 2012 .

[95]  Mark O. Kimberley,et al.  Airborne scanning LiDAR in a double sampling forest carbon inventory , 2012 .

[96]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Prediction of tree biomass in the forest-tundra ecotone using airborne laser scanning , 2012 .

[97]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[98]  Kevin Lim,et al.  LiDAR Sampling Density for Forest Resource Inventories in Ontario, Canada , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[99]  P. Arp,et al.  Using the Cartographic Depth-to-Water Index to Locate Small Streams and Associated Wet Areas across Landscapes , 2012 .

[100]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Advances in Forest Inventory Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[101]  Maria Villikka,et al.  The suitability of leaf-off airborne laser scanning data in an area-based forest inventory of coniferous and deciduous trees , 2012 .

[102]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Forest variable estimation using a high-resolution digital surface model , 2012 .

[103]  Michael G. Wing,et al.  Tree Location Measurement Accuracy with a Mapping-Grade GPS Receiver under Forest Canopy , 2012 .

[104]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Influence of Vegetation Structure on Lidar-derived Canopy Height and Fractional Cover in Forested Riparian Buffers During Leaf-Off and Leaf-On Conditions , 2013, PloS one.

[105]  Marek K. Jakubowski,et al.  Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy , 2013 .

[106]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Stem biomass estimation based on stem reconstruction from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds , 2013 .

[107]  Rachel Gaulton,et al.  The potential of dual-wavelength laser scanning for estimating vegetation moisture content , 2013 .

[108]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Classification of Spruce and Pine Trees Using Active Hyperspectral LiDAR , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[109]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .