Dynamic Decoupling of Robot Manipulators: A Review with New Examples

In this chapter, a review of the main methods permitting to achieve the dynamic decoupling of robot manipulators is presented. The design approaches based on the variation of mechanical parameters are disclosed via three sub-groups: decoupling of dynamic equations via mass redistribution; decoupling of dynamic equations via actuator relocation and decoupling of dynamic equations via addition of auxiliary links. The last approach is illustrated via two examples. In the first solution, the optimal design is achieved via gears used as counterweights. It is allows a considerable reduction of the total masses of links of the decoupled manipulator. In the second solution, the dynamic decoupling of robot manipulators is achieved by using an epicyclic gear train. Special attention is paid to the dynamic decoupling of robot manipulators through the use of the double integrator. The second-order linear and time-invariant dynamical system, called double integrator, is one of the most fundamental systems in control applications. It can be considered as single-degree-of-freedom translational and rotational motion. The present review considers in detail the aim of this solution, as well as the advantages of the joint application development inclosing mechanical and control solutions.

[1]  William S. Levine,et al.  The Control Handbook , 2005 .

[2]  Daniel C. H. Yang,et al.  Performance evaluation of dynamically linearized and kinematically redundant planar manipulators , 1989 .

[3]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Robot analysis and control , 1988, Autom..

[4]  L. M. Hocking Optimal control : an introduction to the theory with applications , 1991 .

[5]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[6]  J. Descusse,et al.  Solution to Morgan's problem , 1988 .

[7]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  An adaptive switching learning control method for trajectory tracking of robot manipulators , 2006 .

[8]  John J. Craig,et al.  Introduction to Robotics Mechanics and Control , 1986 .

[9]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  The Design of Open-Loop Manipulator Arms With Decoupled and Configuration-Invariant Inertia Tensors , 1987 .

[10]  Paolo Rocco,et al.  Stability of PID control for industrial robot arms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Yaobin Chen,et al.  Structure of minimum-time control law for robotic manipulators with constrained paths , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Truong Dam,et al.  PID position domain control for contour tracking , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[13]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Near-Minimum-Time Control of Robot Manipulators , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  Naive control of the double integrator , 2001 .

[15]  H. A. Talebi,et al.  A robust feedback linearization approach for tracking control of flexible-link manipulators using an EKF disturbance estimator , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Yun Li,et al.  PID control system analysis, design, and technology , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Yuxin Su,et al.  Global Asymptotic Stability of PID Controller for Robotic Manipulators , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[18]  J. Senthil Kumar,et al.  Control and tracking of robotic manipulator using PID controller and hardware in Loop Simulation , 2014 .

[19]  Vigen Arakelian,et al.  Design of Scotch yoke mechanisms with improved driving dynamics , 2016 .

[20]  S. Bhat,et al.  Continuous finite-time stabilization of the translational and rotational double integrators , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[21]  Liang Yong,et al.  Decoupling of dynamic equations by means of adaptive balancing of 2-dof open-loop mechanisms , 2004 .

[22]  Rafael Kelly,et al.  A class of nonlinear PID global regulators for robot manipulators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).