Teacher Preparation and Student Achievement

There are fierce debates over the best way to prepare teachers. Some argue that easing entry into teaching is necessary to attract strong candidates, whereas others argue that investing in high quality teacher preparation is the most promising approach. Most agree, however, that we lack a strong research basis for understanding how to prepare teachers. This article is one of the first to estimate the effects of features of teachers’ preparation on teachers’ value added to student test score performance. Our results indicate variation across preparation programs in the average effectiveness of the teachers they are supplying to New York City schools. In particular, preparation directly linked to practice appears to benefit teachers in their 1st year.

[1]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement , 2008 .

[2]  Peter A. Youngs,et al.  Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement Gains: A Review , 2003 .

[3]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Teaching as the Learning Profession : Handbook of Policy and Practice , 1999 .

[4]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  The Draw of Home: How Teachers&Apos; Preferences for Proximity Disadvantage Urban Schools , 2003 .

[5]  E. Wragg.  A review of research in teacher education , 1982 .

[6]  S. Loeb,et al.  Complex by Design , 2006 .

[7]  Robert H. Meyer,et al.  Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer , 1997 .

[8]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement? , 2007 .

[9]  A. Levine,et al.  Educating School Teachers. , 2006 .

[10]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Transitions into Teaching: Learning to Teach Writing in Teacher Education and Beyond , 2000 .

[11]  Marjorie E. Wechsler,et al.  Characteristics of Effective Alternative Teacher Certification Programs , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[12]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability , 2004 .

[13]  J. Bransford,et al.  Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. , 2005 .

[14]  J. Stenton,et al.  Learning how to teach. , 1973, Nursing mirror and midwives journal.

[15]  S. Loeb,et al.  Recruiting Effective Math Teachers: How Do Math Immersion Teachers Compare?: Evidence from New York City , 2010 .

[16]  Dan Goldhaber,et al.  Can Teacher Quality Be Effectively Assessed? National Board Certification as a Signal of Effective Teaching , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[17]  John S. Rigden,et al.  Editorial: The Carnegie report, ‘‘A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century’’ , 1986 .

[18]  M. Lansing,et al.  Holmes Group, The. . Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. , 1986 .

[19]  J. Bransford,et al.  Preparing teachers for a changing world , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Wright,et al.  Controlling for Student Background in Value-Added Assessment of Teachers , 2004 .

[21]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Individual Teacher Incentives and Student Performance , 2006 .

[22]  Suzanne M. Wilson,et al.  Creating Effective Teachers: Concise Answers for Hard Questions. An Addendum to the Report "Teacher Preparation Research: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations.". , 2003 .

[23]  Maynard J. Bratlien,et al.  Teachers for Our Nation's Schools. , 2002 .

[24]  Susy Macqueen,et al.  Validity , 1973, Just Algorithms.

[25]  S. Loeb,et al.  Measuring Effect Sizes: the Effect of Measurement Error , 2008 .

[26]  S. Feiman-Nemser,et al.  Teacher Preparation: Structural and Conceptual Alternatives , 2007 .

[27]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation at the Graduate Level. , 2000 .

[28]  S. Loeb,et al.  Surveying the Landscape of Teacher Education in New York City: Constrained Variation and the Challenge of Innovation , 2008 .

[29]  Jesse Rothstein,et al.  Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement , 2008 .

[30]  J. Riley,et al.  Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge , 2007 .