Lego robotics : an authentic problem solving tool?

With the current curriculum focus on correlating classroom problem solving lessons to real-world contexts, are LEGO robotics an effective problem solving tool? This present study was designed to investigate this question and to ascertain what problem solving strategies primary students engaged with when working with LEGO robotics and whether the students were able to effectively relate their problem solving strategies to real-world contexts. The qualitative study involved 23 Grade 6 students participating in robotics activities. The study included data collected from researcher observations of student problem solving discussions, collected software programs, and data from a student completed questionnaire. Results from the study indicated that the robotic activities assisted students to reflect on the problem-solving decisions they made. The study also highlighted that the students were able to relate their problem solving strategies to real-world contexts. The study demonstrated that while LEGO robotics can be considered useful problem solving tools in the classroom, careful teacher scaffolding needs to be implemented in regards to correlating LEGO with authentic problem solving. Further research in regards to how teachers can best embed real-world contexts into effective robotics lessons is recommended.

[1]  Stephen J. Norton,et al.  Problem Solving in a Middle School Robotics Design Classroom , 2007 .

[2]  R. Skemp The psychology of learning mathematics , 1979 .

[3]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Scaffolding Knowledge Construction through Robotic Technology: A Middle School Case Study , 2007 .

[4]  A. King Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance , 1991 .

[5]  K. R. Priya Grounded Theory Methodology , 2013 .

[6]  Gregory Schraw Promoting general metacognitive awareness , 1998 .

[7]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Designing, Developing, and Implementing a Course on LEGO Robotics for Technology Teacher Education , 2003 .

[8]  Tim O. Peterson So You’re Thinking of Trying Problem Based Learning?: Three Critical Success Factors for Implementation , 2004 .

[9]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective , 1996 .

[10]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. , 1985 .

[11]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[12]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Developing conceptual understanding of mechanical advantage through the use of Lego robotic technology , 2008 .

[13]  K. Pang Creating Stimulating Learning And Thinking Using New Models Of Activity-Based Learning And Metacognitive-Based Activities , 2010 .

[14]  Thomas Lowrie,et al.  Problem Solving by Any Other Name , 2002 .

[15]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving , 2009 .

[16]  Joanna Le Métais International Trends in Curriculum Frameworks , 2003 .

[17]  S. Papert The children's machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer , 1993 .

[18]  Richard Dillon Using a Robotics Contest to Enhance Student Creativity and Problem Solving Skills. , 1995 .

[19]  Christine E Edwards-Leis,et al.  Matching mental models : the starting point for authentic assessment in robotics , 2008 .

[20]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks , 2002 .