The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Text Genre on Readers' Prediction Strategies

This study examined the influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers' prediction strategies. Three groups of subjects read two genres of text (short stories and essays), and gave verbal reports of their prediction strategies while reading. Next, subjects rated the texts in terms of relative familiarity of text content. Quantitative analysis of the think-aloud protocols indicated statistically significant differences in frequency of reports of predictions for particular texts. Subjects reported making significantly more predictions on the essays rated more familiar, and on the story which was rated more familiar. There were no significant differences in frequency of reported predictions on the short story and essay which were rated most familiar. Results indicate that readers' prior knowledge for the content of the text may significantly influence the nature of readers' prediction strategies. Qualitative analysis of protocols allowed for examination of the variation in the types of predictions and prediction-related strategies which were used by readers in this study. Implications of findings for reading comprehension theory and educational practice are discussed.

[1]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[2]  Peter P. Afflerbach,et al.  On the Use of Verbal Reports in Reading Research , 1984 .

[3]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[4]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[5]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[6]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Strategies for Controlling Hypothesis Formation in Reading , 1984 .

[7]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  Cognitive aspects of genre , 1981 .

[8]  R. Sternberg,et al.  How and How Much Can Intelligence Be Increased , 1982 .

[9]  James Flood,et al.  Promoting reading comprehension , 1984 .

[10]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Inference in Text Understanding , 1987, AAAI.

[11]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[12]  H. McClusky.  An experiment on the influence of preliminary skimming on reading. , 1934 .

[13]  W. H. Macginitie,et al.  Identifying Children Who Use a Perservative Text Processing Strategy. , 1984 .

[14]  Sheridan Warner Baker.  The complete stylist and handbook , 1976 .

[15]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Teaching the process of reading comprehension , 1980 .

[16]  Harry Singer,et al.  Theoretical models and processes of reading , 1976 .

[17]  C. Bereiter,et al.  Use of Thinking Aloud in Identification and Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies , 1985 .

[18]  Jane Hansen,et al.  The Effects of Inference Training and Practice on Young Children's Reading Comprehension. , 1981 .

[19]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. , 1990 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of the reader's schema at different points in time , 1979 .

[21]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  The Process of Constructing Main Ideas From Text , 1985 .

[22]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Plans and Social Actions , 1977 .

[23]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 306. , 1988 .

[24]  Yetta M. Goodman,et al.  Reading Strategies: Focus on Comprehension , 1980 .