Through the Looking Glass (Self): The Impact of Wearable Technology on Perceptions of Face-to-Face Interaction

Advancements in wearable technology have allowed for extradyadic social cues to be inserted directly (albeit conspicuously) into face-to-face interactions. The current study simulated a fictitious “Looking Glass” program that (a) autodetects (via facial recognition) one’s partner and (b) displays that person’s last 12 social media posts on a pair of Google Glass. In a randomized case/control experiment, nonwearers were more likely to perceive Glass wearers as physically attractive and socioemotionally close, while feeling lower self-esteem and having higher mental and physical demand with the conversation. Open-ended data suggested Glass wearers to be less attentive to the conversation, and Glass-present conversations were less on topic. These data, while preliminary and based on a small sample of users, hold implications for future application and research on cyborgic face-to-face interactions.

[1]  M. Ginsberg.  Human Nature and the Social Order , 1941, Nature.

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[4]  João Costa Seco,et al.  The Conversation Calculus: A Model of Service-Oriented Computation , 2008, ESOP.

[5]  Nicholas David Bowman,et al.  How demanding is social media: Understanding social media diets as a function of perceived costs and benefits - A rational actor perspective , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[7]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  T. Heatherton,et al.  Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. , 1991 .

[9]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  Andy Clark,et al.  Natural-Born Cyborgs? , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[11]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[12]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[13]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Initial Interaction Expectations with Robots: Testing the Human-To-Human Interaction Script , 2016 .

[14]  P. Barrett,et al.  The scale of perceived interpersonal closeness (PICS) , 2003 .

[15]  S. Penner.  Critical observations on the U.S. National Energy Plan (NEP) , 1979 .

[16]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[17]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[18]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[19]  Michael Sunnafrank.  Predicted Outcome Value in Initial Conversations , 1988 .