Stochastic behavior of robots that navigate by interacting with their environment

This paper reports on the benefit of including boundary interaction behaviors, specifically wall-following, in reducing the position uncertainty of mobile robots with little or no localization capacity. Assuming that the robot has some primitive wall-following capabilities, and can switch its behavior depending on whether it moves in free-space or along obstacle boundaries, the time evolution of its trajectories is modeled by a stochastic differential equation with piece-wise constant drift and diffusion terms. The probability law of this piece-wise linear time-invariant diffusion is matched at any given time instant by that of an appropriately constructed single diffusion, in what is called here a time-weighted convolution. Since the Fokker-Planck associated with the single diffusion can be solved analytically, this matching enables the exact calculation of the position distribution of the stochastic switching vehicle dynamics at any given stopping time.

[1]  Konstantinos Karydis,et al.  Planning with the STAR(s) , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Ricardo G. Sanfelice,et al.  Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Modeling, Stability, and Robustness , 2012 .

[3]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Robot navigation in unknown terrains: Introductory survey of non-heuristic algorithms , 1993 .

[4]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  Probability-driven motion planning for mobile robots , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Konstantinos Karydis,et al.  Probabilistically valid stochastic extensions of deterministic models for systems with uncertainty , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  S. Aachen Stochastic Differential Equations An Introduction With Applications , 2016 .

[7]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  High-speed flight in an ergodic forest , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  David Zarrouk,et al.  Dynamic turning of 13 cm robot comparing tail and differential drive , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Konstantinos Karydis,et al.  A passively sprawling miniature legged robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[10]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  Using Backprojections for Fine Motion Planning with Uncertainty , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  A drift-diffusion model for robotic obstacle avoidance , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[12]  Samuel Burden,et al.  Bio-inspired design and dynamic maneuverability of a minimally actuated six-legged robot , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[13]  Herbert G. Tanner,et al.  Probability of success in stochastic robot navigation with state feedback , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Mathew H. Evans,et al.  Tactile SLAM with a biomimetic whiskered robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Herbert G. Tanner,et al.  Stochastic receding horizon control for robots with probabilistic state constraints , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Amit Singer,et al.  Partially Reflected Diffusion , 2008, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[17]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Fast scale prototyping for folded millirobots , 2008, ICRA.